“I’m sure you recognize
this lovely melody as ‘Stranger in Paradise.’ But did you know that the
original theme is from the ‘Polovtsian Dance No. 2’ by Borodin? So many of the
melodies of well-known popular songs were actually written by the great
masters….”
Thus began the TV
commercial for 120 Music
Masterpieces, a four-LP set of
classical music selections offered by Columbia House and Vista Marketing from
1971 to 1984. This ubiquitous and long-running commercial featured British character
actor John Williams (famous for the Hitchcock films Dial M for Murder and To Catch a Thief, but known in our household as the “fake Mr. French” from the sitcom Family Affair) touting the joys of
discovering how many classical melodies were appropriated for contemporary
pop songs.
This commercial and
Williams’ cultured English accent unfailingly come to mind whenever I watch The Heiress. The reason being that The
Heiress’ oft-repeated love theme —the
1784 Jean-Paul-Egide Martini classical composition Plaisir d’Amour (The Joys of Love)—had its melody borrowed for the popular ballad Can’t Help
Falling in Love in the 1961 film Blue Hawaii. The unfortunate result of all this is that every time the melody is
played in the movie (and that’s quite a lot) it evokes for me not Victorian-era
romance, but Vegas-era Elvis Presley.
Ever the Method actor, Clift learned to play the piano for this scene in which Morris sings The Joys of Love to Catherine |
Olivia de Havilland as Catherine Sloper |
Montgomery Clift as Morris Townsend |
Ralph Richardson as Dr. Austin Sloper |
Miriam Hopkins as Lavinia Penniman |
The Heiress is one of my favorite popcorn
movies. And that’s “popcorn movie” in the old-fashioned sense: an enjoyably
entertaining film, well-acted, with a good story intelligently told, no heavy
message. Not the current definition signifying a check-your-brain-at-the-door
exercise in sophomoric cretinism (cue my usual Adam Sandler, Fast & Furious wisecracks).
Based on the 1947 Broadway play by Ruth & Augustus Goetz,
which itself was adapted from Henry James’ 1880 novel Washington Square,
The Heiress is a serious drama to be sure. But anything deeper to be
found in its subtext regarding the emotionally stifling social class system, or the
lingering imprint of love lost (The Heiress overflows with widows and widowers
who live in the memory of the departed, never entertaining the thought of
finding someone new), remains in service of a not-unfamiliar “Poor Little Rich
Girl” romantic melodrama.
As a motion picture adapted from an esteemed literary work, The Heiress was Paramount’s “prestige film” for the year, its pre-release
publicity suggesting a Grand Romance between fated-to-be lovers kept apart by some shadowy adverse obstacle. In truth, the film is really a rather severe, withering
rumination on love (familial love, romantic love, self-love) and the injurious cost
of its absence.
Three is the Magic Number The Heiress was Montgomery Clift's 3rd film, and his co-star was three years older |
Sharing their home in Washington Square is Dr. Sloper’s sister,
Lavinia (Hopkins) a somewhat frivolous but prototypical example of the kind of aimless social
butterfly women were expected to be in Victorian times. Given to silly flights of romantic fantasy and hyperbole, yet well-versed in the dos
and don’ts of society protocol, Lavinia
is tolerated for her ability to assist Catherine in developing her social graces. Supportive of
her niece and devoted to not seeing her drift heedlessly into spinsterhood with
only her embroidery to keep her company; Lavinia is nevertheless one more pitying voice
reminding Catherine of her lack.
Miriam Hopkins is the queen of the silly and superficial busybody. No matter how extremely her character is written, she finds both the humor and the humanity |
Although Dr. Sloper and Lavinia are both of the mind that Catherine’s failings in looks and charm are significantly mitigated by her being an heiress with a considerable fortune; Lavinia is too much of a romantic to ever admit to such base pragmatism, while Dr. Sloper regards the assessment as indisputable fact…like a medical diagnosis.
Curious then that when an outside party is suspected of
appraising Catherine on much the same terms – the outside party being the
dashing, obscenely handsome and penniless young suitor Morris Townsend (Clift) –
it is only Dr. Sloper who objects.
When that someone comes in the form of Montgomery Clift, playing a man in possession everything that Catherine lacks except money; we can't help but feel (hope) that at least in some ways, this pair is well-suited. Certainly the superficial attractions of physical beauty are no more a barrier to true love than the superficial allure of wealth?
The Heiress deviates from the play in that it never makes the honorableness of Morris' attentions entirely clear. At least not initially. As the film progresses we are manipulated back and forth, forced to view Morris' whirlwind courtship of Catherine through the alternating perspective of Dr. Sloper's suspicious eyes, or Lavinia’s willfully rose-colored glasses.
Provocatively, we’re placed in the position of preferring to be right rather than see Catherine happy (her father, again), or hoping…perhaps beyond reason…that Townsend is not really what he seems and merely a penniless suitor genuinely seeing in Catherine that which we ourselves have been witness to: her very real charms have just not been given the opportunity to develop in the loveless home she shares with her father in Washington Square.
The film tugs at our beauty biases, our belief in Cinderella fantasies, and our weakness for ugly
duckling myths. It also, in providing an emotionally and dramatically satisfying ending which deviates from the novel, taps into the kind of visceral revenge scenario beloved of any individual who has ever felt undervalued or underestimated.
WHAT I LOVE ABOUT
THIS FILM
Popular Hollywood movies all tap into common fantasies. There's clearly a market out there for romantic comedies about cloddish, schlubby boy-men who win impossibly beautiful women simply because they possess an ounce of the most basic human decency. There must be. I'm just happy I don't know that market personally.
Because of the laundry list of my adolescence: shy, one of the few African-Americans in a largely white Catholic school, gay in an all-boys high-school - I'm drawn to stories about outsiders. Those who are habitually overlooked because they don't conform to established norms.
I'm afraid my attitude about those times are reflected in the brand of "outsider" films which have become my favorites over the years: Carrie (shy teen kills entire senior class), That Cold Day in the Park (shy spinster kills for and imprisons sex slave); 3 Women (shy enigma engages in personality theft - deaths to follow)...you get the picture. Revenge fantasies rate rather high among disenfranchised groups, while those high on the status quo curve seem to enjoy "Hey! I'm not a total creep so reward me with my mandatory supermodel!"
"I'd never contradict him." |
The Heiress is my kind of tragic pop fairy-tale in that it tells the story of a woman duped into believing her happiness lies in having someone (a male) deem her to be worthy of love. Though her path one both cruel and life-alteringly painful, she arrives at a place of self-discovery, self-acceptance and, ultimately strength.
And, conforming to the ambiguous tone of all that went before it, the ending of The Heiress can be viewed as either tragic or triumphant with no loss to the film's overall effectiveness and power.
"That's right Father. You never will know, will you?" |
PERFORMANCES
When writing this essay, it came as something of a surprise to me to discover that I've only seen Olivia de Havilland in six films; four of them from her less-than-stellar, post- Lady in a Cage period. But this is more a reflection of the type of movies she appeared in (westerns, period adventure films...none particular favorites) than a reaction to the actress herself, who is still with us at age 99.
Within my admittedly narrow sphere of exposure, I have nothing but admiration for her work in The Heiress. It cannot be an easy feat to imbue an outwardly plain, reactive character like Catherine with as much depth and feeling as de Havilland achieves. Perhaps a flaw in the play's structure is that it is impossible to adapt it in a way in which Catherine can ever be seen in a light reflective of how her father sees her (Wyler encourages us to identify and like Catherine.
Her comic resilience in the face of humiliation after humiliation wins us over). In our being able to so readily appraise and recognize Catherine's worth, her father becomes a villain before he gets a chance to show the sympathetic side of his case.(Marginally sympathetic, anyway. One can empathize with a man missing his wife, but to withhold affection from a motherless child due to repressed resentment or blame is cruel and tragic.). But as I've stated, the narrative tipping point falls to the casting of Morris, and whether or not the actor cast in the role is able to conceivably play sincerity and knavishness with equal credibility.
I like Montgomery Clift great deal, but if reports are true that he was deeply dissatisfied with his performance in The Heiress, I can't say his feelings are entirely unfounded. Simply put, he seems to be outclassed and a tad out of his depth when it comes to to the performances of de Havilland, Richardson, and Hopkins. To be sure, this could merely be an instance of clashing acting styles, his co-stars representing a more formal, old-guard style of acting to his more relaxed contemporary technique, but occasionally both Clift and his line readings have a tendency to come across as stiff an uncomfortable.
However, in his defense, Clift's very "otherness" in manner and speech (whether intentional or not) works marvelously within the context of the story. He's a character of whom we know not where the real person ends and artifice begins. The purpose his character serves in the story is to introduce impulse into the world of strict formality. Clift's awkwardness adds ambiguity.
Montgomery Clift's Method-era naturalness comes from somewhere so genuine, you don't entertain for a minute that he is not as he seems. His beauty is suspicious, but his behavior is not. He seems ill-suited to a certain level of showy artifice, so his scenes with de Havilland have a warmth that has you rooting for their union even as you sense it is ultimately impossible.
I like him a great deal in the film, even while recognizing his Morris Townsend is perhaps not one of his strongest performances.
The Heiress represents Olivia de Havilland's 5th (and final) Oscar nomination and 2nd win in the Best Actress category |
Her comic resilience in the face of humiliation after humiliation wins us over). In our being able to so readily appraise and recognize Catherine's worth, her father becomes a villain before he gets a chance to show the sympathetic side of his case.(Marginally sympathetic, anyway. One can empathize with a man missing his wife, but to withhold affection from a motherless child due to repressed resentment or blame is cruel and tragic.). But as I've stated, the narrative tipping point falls to the casting of Morris, and whether or not the actor cast in the role is able to conceivably play sincerity and knavishness with equal credibility.
I like Montgomery Clift great deal, but if reports are true that he was deeply dissatisfied with his performance in The Heiress, I can't say his feelings are entirely unfounded. Simply put, he seems to be outclassed and a tad out of his depth when it comes to to the performances of de Havilland, Richardson, and Hopkins. To be sure, this could merely be an instance of clashing acting styles, his co-stars representing a more formal, old-guard style of acting to his more relaxed contemporary technique, but occasionally both Clift and his line readings have a tendency to come across as stiff an uncomfortable.
However, in his defense, Clift's very "otherness" in manner and speech (whether intentional or not) works marvelously within the context of the story. He's a character of whom we know not where the real person ends and artifice begins. The purpose his character serves in the story is to introduce impulse into the world of strict formality. Clift's awkwardness adds ambiguity.
Sizing Up The Interloper |
I like him a great deal in the film, even while recognizing his Morris Townsend is perhaps not one of his strongest performances.
As Audrey Hepburn did in Two for the Road, Olivia de Havilland is able to convey very distinct stages in the emotional maturation of her character simply through her facial expressions, body language, and voice modulation. Here, Catherine Sloper has grown into a woman at peace with herself |
THE STUFF OF FANTASY
The Heiress garnered a whopping eight Academy Award nominations in 1949: Best Picture, Director, Supporting Actor (Richardson), Cinematography - winning in the categories of Best Actress (de Havilland), Music (Aaron Copland..a matter of contention), Art Direction (J. Meehan, H. Horner, E. Kuri), and Costume Design (Edith head, Gile Steele).
I'm particularly fond of the costume design and art direction in The Heiress, which is truly gorgeous. Even more so with today's digital restorations and HD TV screens.
The Heiress garnered a whopping eight Academy Award nominations in 1949: Best Picture, Director, Supporting Actor (Richardson), Cinematography - winning in the categories of Best Actress (de Havilland), Music (Aaron Copland..a matter of contention), Art Direction (J. Meehan, H. Horner, E. Kuri), and Costume Design (Edith head, Gile Steele).
I'm particularly fond of the costume design and art direction in The Heiress, which is truly gorgeous. Even more so with today's digital restorations and HD TV screens.
THE STUFF OF DREAMS
Adapted from a Broadway production, The Heiress shows its stage roots in being a somewhat stagy and talky motion picture more reliant on dialog, performance, and characterization than action. In this instance I wouldn't have it any other way, for The Heiress has such marvelous, quotable dialog.
"No child could compete with
this image you have of her mother. You've idealized that poor dead woman beyond
all human recognition."
"Headaches! They strike like a thief in the night! Permit me to retire, of course. It's not like me to give in, dear, but sometimes fortitude is folly!"
"He must come. He must take me away. He must love me. He must!...Morris will love me, for all those who
didn't."
"How is it possible to protect such a willing victim?"
"Yes, I can be very cruel. I have been taught by masters."
"I can tell you now what you have done. You have cheated me. You thought that any handsome, clever man would be as bored with me as you were. It was not love that made you protect me. It was contempt."
BONUS MATERIAL
The legendary 120 Music Masterpieces TV commercial
Copyright © Ken Anderson