tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post223627880900760785..comments2024-03-26T05:01:57.793-07:00Comments on DREAMS ARE WHAT LE CINEMA IS FOR...: EYE OF THE CAT 1969Ken Andersonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comBlogger35125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-62866203226409682872022-06-04T14:50:16.302-07:002022-06-04T14:50:16.302-07:00Ha! Well it helps to remember that this is both a...Ha! Well it helps to remember that this is both a '60s film and a somewhat contrived psychological thriller. It was the fashion that these movies always sought to end on a note of a big question mark...an elliptical note of ambiguity, whether it made much sense or not. I don't think there's any one way to read the ending, but I always took it that since Wylie was never concerned with the money, never took anything seriously, and was never as "in" on the murder plot as everyone assumed (hence his saving Aunt Danny), ever the drifter he would indeed leave Danny and Luke on their own...as trapped with each other as they were at the beginning. Cassia's death is an accident brought on by her fear of the cats, so there is no one to blame. And Any explanation to the police that contradicts that is a confession (from Luke) or an accusation (from Danny) of attempted murder. So the "poetic justice" ending is that these two people who hate each other are somewhat dependent on each other, and Wylie "the innocent" is free to go back to his vagabond existence.<br />Glad you watched this, I love the exasperated tone of your comment, and appreciate your stopping by this post to try to make some sense of it all.Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-13567722300107128362022-06-03T03:14:40.735-07:002022-06-03T03:14:40.735-07:00I have just seen this film on Shudder, and I have ...I have just seen this film on Shudder, and I have a major question about the ending. After Kassia is dead, and Wylie tells Danny and Luke that he never intended to stay, what does that mean? How am I supposed to interpret that? Is he leaving Danny and Luke to take the blame for Kassia's death?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-31407527479865968012019-06-27T21:39:38.592-07:002019-06-27T21:39:38.592-07:00Hi Marck
Thanks so much for clearing up the locati...Hi Marck<br />Thanks so much for clearing up the location of Aunt Danny's house! It's a beautiful area photographed to peak advantage in EYE OF THE CAT, a film with a very jazzy visual style. The elements you mention are well-served by the film finally getting the Blu-ray treatment. Appreciate your reading this post and especially for contributing the geographical and residential stats (that really is one ugly hedge)!Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-26547547257065315012019-06-24T15:56:49.675-07:002019-06-24T15:56:49.675-07:00Beautiful film. Especially that proto-DePalma open...Beautiful film. Especially that proto-DePalma opening sequence, which also evokes the old Batman TV show. <br /><br />I also love the scene shot in Lafayette Park. Those Eucalyptus trunks are personally iconic. <br /><br />Parker's Edith Head wardrobe deserves mention too. Authentic glamour before the term became misused.<br /><br />Geographic notes and correction: Aunt Danny's house is in Pacific Heights; nowhere near Noe Valley. One of the house's subsequent owners also owned the S.F. Giants. The house across Octavia where the wheelchair scene was shot is the Spreckels Mansion, now the residence of novelist Danielle Steel. She's the one responsible for the huge, ugly hedge.Marck }=))>https://www.blogger.com/profile/10800491454723854399noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-28338713453797703032018-10-20T20:00:34.846-07:002018-10-20T20:00:34.846-07:00Hi, Peter
I always admire that you tend to give so...Hi, Peter<br />I always admire that you tend to give so many films the benefit of the doubt. I'm not nearly as flexible. It is strange how everyone goes on and on abut "old" Aunt Danny, and the film treats her like her best days are behind her in spite of the fact that we're looking at a lovely "mature" woman who certainly gave Julie Andrews a run for her money. <br />But I can understand the film not being a grabber for you. Although I find it still so watchable after all these years (it plays even better to me, in fact), but I'd be lying if I didn't admit that nostalgia plays a part in my appreciation.<br />And I thank you on behalf of all future visitors to this post for providing us all with a link to a pristine copy of this long-unavailable film. Good to hear from you (as always)!Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-23502452175408526842018-10-20T10:07:59.805-07:002018-10-20T10:07:59.805-07:00I know I'm years late to this party, but there...I know I'm years late to this party, but there's currently an excellent quality print on YouTube:<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdhE3qHwejw<br /><br />I watched it last night and, while I thought the cinematography and set design were excellent, I wasn't blown away despite being a huge Eleanor Parker fan (she's what led me to the film). As someone said earlier I think, at 46 or so, she was certainly too young for this sort of exercise in hag-spoitation, though she was certainly older than Debbie Reynolds was in "What's the Matter With Helen," so who's to say? Anyway, if was certainly fun discovering your post about it!Peter Lappinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05109154527996679077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-85681545978503486082016-01-17T21:25:24.873-08:002016-01-17T21:25:24.873-08:00Ha! Congrats on finding yet another title in your ...Ha! Congrats on finding yet another title in your Eleanor Parker search! And how very kind of you to pass on the link for "In search of Gregory."<br />It is a film I've seen (in fact, I'll always remember it as the first film I ever saw Christie without her ever-present bangs), and she DOES look remarkable in it. It has my favorite Michael Sarrazin in it of course, and just writing this makes me want to check it out again, as it's been several years. <br />I agree it's an odd one, but for a Christie fetishist, it's heaven! Thank you Joel, you're a very nice guy.Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-88125113066857551792016-01-17T19:11:20.131-08:002016-01-17T19:11:20.131-08:00Hi Ken,
Just popping back with two pieces of news...Hi Ken,<br /><br />Just popping back with two pieces of news. I found another Eleanor Parker title that I was missing, Madison Avenue!! So yeah for me but the other nugget is one that I think you'll be more interested in. I found the elusive In Search of Gregory starring Julie Christie on YouTube!! I know you love her as I do and I wasn't sure if it was one that you've seen or was searching for as I've been but thought I'd pass the link along just in case.<br /><br />https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxJQoGiaZ1E<br /><br />It's an odd one but she looks A-M-A-Z-I-N-G!!!<br /><br />Now if I could just find Miss Mary!joel65913https://www.blogger.com/profile/14526657073681774683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-8749302990349133792016-01-14T15:59:33.057-08:002016-01-14T15:59:33.057-08:00It really is a wonderful way to see different face...It really is a wonderful way to see different facets of the performers. <br /><br />It's also interesting how some were practically fully formed right from the get go-both Kate & Audrey Hepburn, Dorothy McGuire, Hedy Lamarr, Judy Holliday and Maggie Sullavan to name a few, they refined their personas slightly as they went along but their essence was there right from the start.<br /><br />Contrast that with someone like Jane Wyman who worked her way up from being an extra and if you only knew her from her later serene, somewhat tough roles it's a trifle shocking how she twisted and turned until she arrived. For instance when I watched The Doughgirls...a real goldmine in my viewing starring as it did FOUR of the ladies on my list, Jane, Ann Sheridan, Eve Arden and Alexis Smith (she's one of the performers I'm within one film of completing her work-the seemingly locked in a crypt "The Decision of Christopher Blake")...Jane played a woman who could only be described as a borderline idiot with a high breathy voice and an addlepated demeanor. It's quite a turnabout from her later low-key calmness, it also shows how skillful she was since her Vivien comes across as sweet and endearing rather than annoying or irritating which is how a less talented actress could have played her.<br /><br />She's probably the best example though Joan Bennett, Ginger Rogers and Ida Lupino did a great deal of morphing throughout their early careers.joel65913https://www.blogger.com/profile/14526657073681774683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-19622903310978497772016-01-13T15:40:28.186-08:002016-01-13T15:40:28.186-08:00Hey Joel
That actually sounds like a wonderful way...Hey Joel<br />That actually sounds like a wonderful way to not only appreciate the diversity of a star often known exclusively for just a handful of roles, but a way to possibly unearth a gem you'd otherwise have no knowledge of whatsoever.<br />I haven't been conscious of it myself, but I've been doing that with Glenda Jackson and Julie Christie, seeing all but a few outlying films. I'm sure you've discovered how trying it can be sticking it out through a film you're otherwise loathing, waiting for the scenes of your favorite to appear.<br /><br />the internet and the ever changing flow of films available on various sites has been a significant boon in your quest, I'm sure.<br />That Mitzi Gaynor film, however, sounds like a real find! Congrats on your success!Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-68735016303480007372016-01-13T08:29:28.765-08:002016-01-13T08:29:28.765-08:00Hi again Ken,
I meant to mention in regards to th...Hi again Ken,<br /><br />I meant to mention in regards to those Holy Grail titles that for some reason the last couple of weeks have been particularly fruitful ones in tracking them down. I've managed to track down 15 all told. They've been a ragged bunch with some real lulus in the mix, Babes in Bagdad was one of them and there was a sword and sandal epic called The Golden Horde with Ann Blyth as the princess of Samarkand! that was a real pip but the one I really wanted to point out was a Mitzi Gaynor WESTERN!! if you can believe it! called Three Young Texans! Oh it was a hoot, not only was it Mitzi on the range, she was brunette but her make-up said next up at the Copa, but Aaron Spelling was one of the villains along with Michael Ansara. At least it had Jeffrey Hunter to look at and remove some of the absurdity.joel65913https://www.blogger.com/profile/14526657073681774683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-29374893797882992182016-01-12T20:12:18.367-08:002016-01-12T20:12:18.367-08:00Oh Ken how could I leave the fab Miss Parker off m...Oh Ken how could I leave the fab Miss Parker off my list!! For the most part she’s lead me a merry journey through her films with some delightful surprises along the way (I loved the soapy goodness of The Seventh Sin & The Voice of the Turtle was adorable even with that jackass Reagan in it), and the ones I have left don’t look like they contain any real landmines. She’s never lead me down dark paths to schlock like the dreadful Mansion of the Doomed (Gloria Grahame), the claptrap Babes in Bagdad (Paulette Goddard) nor the outright bottom of the barrel Flesh Feast (Veronica Lake).<br /><br />I actually started my self-styled quest with approximately 100 of my favorites, it seems like a lot but how quickly they piled up between both starring and supporting actresses and actors! <br /><br />Since I’ve begun I’ve managed to complete 18. Of those only three, Judy Garland, Debbie Reynolds and Mae West, were a breeze. Even some that I thought would be a snap, Kate Hepburn, Grace Kelly, Marilyn Monroe, always had one or two elusive titles. I almost wept the day I found “Under My Skin” which was the last John Garfield film I had been seeking for years, happily it was great…certainly the exception in these cases (Hepburn’s Grace Quigley was wretched!!! And Kelly’s Green Fire extremely mediocre) My lists only encompass theatrical films, someone like Barbara Stanwyck or Jane Wyman’s catalogue would be insurmountable with all the TV they did, though I’ll happily watch one of their TV movies or shows if I have the chance.<br /><br />Where it gets really frustrating is when I get within a film of two, I’m within one picture for ten performers and two for another eleven, and those films seems unavailable. Needless to say my Holy Grail list is VERY long! But then one turns up and I get almost giddy as I did with Eye of the Cat.<br />joel65913https://www.blogger.com/profile/14526657073681774683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-75827312287580259002016-01-12T15:13:03.751-08:002016-01-12T15:13:03.751-08:00Hi Joel
Thanks for bouncing over here from Poseido...Hi Joel<br />Thanks for bouncing over here from Poseidon's! Although I think I was aware of your desire to see the entire creative output of some of your favorite stars, I didn't know Eleanor Parker was on the list.<br />For all the reason's you cite, I can't imagine this being a film more notable than one of those that grows precious due to its unavailability. Since it looks like it may never see a legitimate DVD release, its great that YouTube still has its fuzz copy up.<br />As much as like like Sarrazin, I totally see your point. In later years (like when he appeared opposite Streisand in "For Pete's Sake" and I swore he was the same blank, nondescript actor she chose for "Up the Sandbox") he really did seem to turn fading into the scenery into an art form.<br />However, Gayle Hunnicut is rather a gorgeous, underappreciated plus, and it's nice to hear you share a similar enthusiasm for her. <br />Very enjoyable reading your thoughts on this movie, from Sarrazin needing a sandwich to Parker's unflattering wig. Always a pleasure, Joel...Thanks!<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-51124832613177902442016-01-12T13:07:14.789-08:002016-01-12T13:07:14.789-08:00Hi Ken,
I hopped over from Poseidon's review...Hi Ken, <br /><br />I hopped over from Poseidon's review of this literal creature feature. Like he I was able to finally catch up with it this week via YouTube and thought it was quite fun.<br /><br />Your memories of seeing it in the theatre on its original release add a nice patina of appropriate time and place to the picture.<br /><br />Once was enough for me but there was much to enjoy in the film though it really leaned more towards the soap operaish than the supernatural that I had been expecting. That was A-Okay by me since I find more pleasure in the former than the latter. <br /><br />I always forgot how stunning Gayle Hunnicutt was. Never being an important star of the period like Audrey Hepburn and fortunately not having a tragedy attached to her name like Sharon Tate she doesn’t show up in many of the recaps that look at the beauties of that time. Kudos should go to the makeup crew also, they had a lot to work with for sure but it’s great how they emphasized Gayle’s more feline qualities to enhance that connection to the main story.<br /><br />I’ve never been that impressed by Michael Sarrazin. It’s not that I don’t like him or think he’s a bad actor but neither is he an especially memorable one. He’s the sort of dependable type that would have done well back in the 40’s & 50’s being steamrolled over by a high powered leading lady such as Crawford or Barbara Stanwyck. For me his peak was in They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? because he was ideally cast as the audience surrogate, his recessive presence was a perfect mirror for us to observe. In this he is again rather laid back but for someone who is supposed to be the focal point that doesn’t work as well, both Gayle and Eleanor dominate any scene they share with him. He’s in good shape, although he looks like he needs a sandwich throughout, and not shy at allowing himself to be used basically as a himbo but frankly Tim Henry as his brother has it all over him both in looks and, though its underused, personality. If I had one complaint about the film it’s that he should have been in more of it. <br /><br />Now we get to the reason we’re all here! Eleanor Parker works her part for all it was worth, too bad she was stuck under than monstrosity of a wig! She went through many different hair shades in her career but I think this might have been the least becoming. She emotes with everything she’s got in that wheelchair scene but otherwise plays it pretty much in line with the story. <br /><br />Even though as I said I don’t see myself returning to this particular well anytime soon I’m glad I finally was able to find it. Funny I’ve been trying to see all of Eleanor Parker’s films and I had pretty much resigned myself that this would be the last and most elusive so I was doubly pleased to stumble across it. Now if I could just find The Mysterious Doctor and The Last Ride from her early days!! I have a bead on the other three I'm missing. <br />joel65913https://www.blogger.com/profile/14526657073681774683noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-33440743038702504262015-06-02T03:01:36.404-07:002015-06-02T03:01:36.404-07:00You're welcome! And yes, that's Lafayette ...You're welcome! And yes, that's Lafayette park used for the "meeting" sequence.Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-37196669981699479602015-06-01T21:29:46.629-07:002015-06-01T21:29:46.629-07:00Thanks for info. Was near Octavia and Washington t...Thanks for info. Was near Octavia and Washington today and thought of Eye of the Cat. Also was at Lafayette Park today Was that the park that was featured in the movie?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-8416309899153166802013-07-03T03:23:49.431-07:002013-07-03T03:23:49.431-07:00Ha! I don't like it well enough to write about...Ha! I don't like it well enough to write about it, or own it...but I like Michael Sarrazin, and the theme was spooky. angelman66https://www.blogger.com/profile/16471674180789592940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-40471221148283408632013-07-03T00:24:40.844-07:002013-07-03T00:24:40.844-07:00Another one that needs a decent DVD transfer! Your...Another one that needs a decent DVD transfer! Your instincts are tight, I'm positive you would enjoy this film. (By the way, I totally missed the TCM roundup of Eleanor Parker films...I didn't even know about it!)<br />As for "The Reincarnation of Peter Proud" that is a big fave of mine. I really love it, although I don't think it's very good. It's one of those weak films that I nevertheless find to be highly! I hope to write about it sometime. If it's a fave of yours, maybe i'll read about it on your blog!Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-71418456698511777222013-07-02T08:42:37.149-07:002013-07-02T08:42:37.149-07:00Another one I NEED to see. Looks like it's rig...Another one I NEED to see. Looks like it's right up my alley. I look forward to another Eleanor Parker performance (wasn't TCMs birthday roundup of Parker's films fun last week?), and I am also a big Michael Sarrazin fan. Are you familiar with The Reincarnation of Peter Proud? angelman66https://www.blogger.com/profile/16471674180789592940noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-88260833250444371712013-04-24T22:31:25.536-07:002013-04-24T22:31:25.536-07:00Hi WaverBoy
Thank you very much for your kind word...Hi WaverBoy<br />Thank you very much for your kind words about my blog. I'm glad that you visit the site from time to time, and happier still that my highlighting of a particular obscure film inspired you to seek out a copy of your own. For they are obscurities, to be sure.<br />I'm unfamiliar with the TV movie you mentioned. So few of those are released on DVD, but I know that somewhere out there someone has a copy of it (perhaps YouTube...I should check). <br />And alas, yes...Roddy McDowall is not exactly high on my list of actors, although he seems to appear in quite a large number of the films I like. I really liked him in "Evil Under the Sun" but that's about it. It's purely a matter of personal taste for me. I'm glad to hear you enjoy him in so many films. If you happen to get "Eye of the Cat" please stop by and let me know what you think. Enjoy, and thanks!Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-76126753521358301552013-04-24T15:44:33.849-07:002013-04-24T15:44:33.849-07:00I've been checking out your reviews of obscuri...I've been checking out your reviews of obscurities from time to time, and always find them most informative and engaging. I believe it was you who inspired me to order THE COOL ONES from the Warner Archive. EYE OF THE CAT sounds like a hell of a lot of fun, so now I gotta order a copy Cinema De Bizarre! Incidentally, director David Lowell Rich helmed one of my fave childhood telefilms, the WWII action drama DEATH RACE (1973), with a powerhouse cast including Lloyd Bridges, Roy Thinnes, Doug McClure and Eric Braeden. This is the one with the crippled Allied plane that tries to evade and destroy a pursuing Nazi tank. That might be one for a future blog entry!<br /><br />I will say that I'm puzzled over your seeming general distaste for Roddy McDowall; I find him to be a highly underrated, intense, nearly always believable actor, and when he's slumming, he really livens up otherwise unwatchable stuff like IT! (1966). I absolutely love his turn as the psycho unemployed stage actor in the Naked City episode THE FAULT IN OUR STARS.WaverBoyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05862354521504490472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-38876482433570624882012-12-28T08:18:36.992-08:002012-12-28T08:18:36.992-08:00Willie
I'll take your recommendations to heart...Willie<br />I'll take your recommendations to heart. I've not seen either film. Not too keen on either George Peppard or James Garner, but Hunnicutt is worth a look in anything. As you say, she was one of the few beauties of that time who could really act. <br />A comment by a previous poster (Ivan) regarding just how distractingly beautiful she was may have played a part in the trajectory of her career. As 70's films became more naturalistic, her kind of lacquered good looks made her conspicuous in certain roles. (She does have a cute cameo in the so-bad-it's good, "The Love Machine"). <br />Thanks and good luck in seeking out the uncut "Eye of the Cat" you'll be surprised at the changes!Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-3933171725612682122012-12-28T04:50:33.365-08:002012-12-28T04:50:33.365-08:00Thank you Ken! I now want to see the theatrical v...Thank you Ken! I now want to see the theatrical version of the film after what you wrote about the "de-fanged" TV-version. <br /><br />I want to recommend two more Gayle Hunnicut movies. In both "P.J." and "Marlowe" she is gorgeous. I find myself often watching "Marlowe" as it is a very entertaining movie. I'm surprised that she didn't get more roles in Hollywood movies since she was pretty and could act, but I think the early 70's was a bad time for actresses generally. <br /><br />-WilleAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-81407599560975648122012-12-26T09:02:09.952-08:002012-12-26T09:02:09.952-08:00Hi Ivan
I really loved your line: "What's...Hi Ivan<br />I really loved your line: "What's she doing here? Is she a slumming model?"<br />I've never seen "The Wild Angels" before, but had I seen Hunnicutt's glacial beauty among the usual cycle and leather set in this Roger Corman flick, those would have been my thoughts exactly!<br />I had the pleasure of seeing "The Legend of Hell House" for the first time this year thanks to TCM. Roddy McDowall is always a chore, but I loved Hunnicutt and her hair. She has aged into a very striking older woman, but her look in the 60s/early 70s is very sensual. For some reason I had always assumed she was British. In researching this post, I was surprised to find she's a Texan, of all things.Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2627032459273165000.post-77022805409643533422012-12-26T08:54:23.426-08:002012-12-26T08:54:23.426-08:00Hello again Willie
Yes. When Eye of the Cat was ai...Hello again Willie<br />Yes. When Eye of the Cat was aired on TV in the 70s it was significantly re-edited and entire scenes jettisoned and replaced. This "edited for TV" version is the one that is most commonly known by most young people. I recall well the original theatrical version, so when I ordered a DVD copy of the film from Cinema De Bizarre, I was happy to find it to be the complete theatrical version. It seems to have been struck from perhaps a PAL vhs (if there is such a thing) so there is a slight speed up in pitch and the quality isn''t that great, but the film is complete. The full version keeps in the minor nudity and the a last half hour you'll find is almost completely reworked from how they softened it for TV. The ending is more gruesome and in keeping with the creep out mystery of it all. Worth hunting down if you liked the de-fanged TV version you saw (there's always hope that Universal will dig this one out of their vaults).<br />I first saw Gayle Hunnicutt as this man-hating spy in an episode of TV's "Get Smart" and she was really a stunner. She and then hubby David Hemmings were quite the epitome of mod 60s glamour. Sarrazin was certainly poised for big-scale stardom with the kinds of roles he was given (and his own real-life association with Hunnicutt look-alike Jacqueline Bissett), but as you indicate, neither he nor Hunnicutt were able to extend their star momentum far into the 70s. Too bad, I think both are very charismatic. Thanks for stopping by again, Willie. With your appreciation of Hunnicutt and Julie Christie, I think you display great taste!), <br />Ken Andersonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04940648971296673233noreply@blogger.com