In 1980, if you were of R-rated moviegoing age and among those who first got a glimpse of that
unforgettably chilling, minimalist classic of a theatrical teaser trailer for The Shining; there was no way in hell
you weren't going to see the movie. (1980 Teaser Trailer for The Shining on YouTube)
Barry Lyndon (1975) to be, if not exactly masterpieces, then certainly masterful, I sincerely believed that Kubrick’s The Shining had the potential to be the Rosemary’s Baby or The Exorcist of the '80s.
Copyright © Ken Anderson 2009 - 2012
If I remember correctly, I first saw the trailer at Hollywood’s Mann’s
Chinese Theater as early as December of 1979 or January of 1980 (The Shining was released in May 1980 to
kick off the Memorial Day weekend). Then, as now, the average movie trailer hewed
to the familiar pattern of sensory bombardment combined with the suspense-killing,
full disclosure of each and every plot point that might have rendered the film even remotely intriguing
(the term, “spoilers” didn't exist). The trailer for The Shining deviated so significantly from the prevailing standard
that when first appeared that famous static shot of the twin elevator doors, accompanied
by that eerily intensifying discordant music, the theater became so still you
could practically feel the collective pupils of the eyes in the audience
dilate all at once.
In 1980 Stephen King was not the household name he is today so the floating title, “The Shining” drew little response. It was only when Stanley
Kubrick’s name was revealed that the crowd joined together in what can best be described as an
aggregate, apex-of-the-rollercoaster, intake of air. At the same time—as nothing had yet happened
onscreen beyond the music growing increasingly agitated and ominous— a
pervasive air of, WTF? mushroomed throughout
the theater like a vapor.
And then, the slow-motion torrent of blood began to spew forth from the
elevator shaft. Oh…My…God. All at once the thudding soundtrack was drowned out by a consolidated,
rising-tide of “Whoooooa!” from the audience that lasted until the now-bloodstained screen once again displayed the film's title. A second or two of stunned silence was followed by applause, animated chatter, and delighted giggles of the sort usually associated with a children's birthday party after a magician has pulled off a
particularly startling bit of trickery. On the strength of this one remarkably classy, 90-second trailer, coupled
with the anomaly of an Oscar-nominated director of Kubrick’s stature venturing
into the realm of horror, over the course of the next few months The Shining became the movie to
see.
Barry Lyndon (1975) to be, if not exactly masterpieces, then certainly masterful, I sincerely believed that Kubrick’s The Shining had the potential to be the Rosemary’s Baby or The Exorcist of the '80s.
Jack Nicholson as Jack Torrance |
Shelley Duvall as Wendy Torrance |
Danny Lloyd as Danny Torrance |
Scatman Crothers as Dick Hallorann |
Barry Nelson as Stuart Ullman |
If ever you want to get both the best experience of a movie, yet at the
same time the least reliable impression of how that film will actually perform
at the boxoffice, go see it on opening day. I attended an evening show of The Shining when it opened on May 23,
1980 at Mann’s Chinese Theater in Hollywood. The turnout was amazing. The crowds stretched
around the block, past the parking lot, and into the nearby residential
neighborhood. All of us waiting in line (some as long as three hours) were
geared up for the scare of our lives, positive we were going to be among the
first to see the big blockbuster hit of the summer. Fanning the flames was an enormous
blow-up of Newsweek magazine’s rave
review of The Shining (“The Ultimate
Horror Movie!”) displayed in the theater’s forecourt. When the ushers came to
release the velvet rope, I’m sure our faces had about them the look of vague
genuflection, as though we were being granted a supreme privilege rather than just
being allowed to see a movie we’d just paid for.
There’s a point at which one’s expectations for a movie can be so high
that, on first viewing, you’re not responding to the film so much as reacting
to whether or not the film has met or dashed your hopes. Such was the case for me on first seeing The Shining. So keen was I on The Shining being the epic horror film the
pedigree of its cast and director augured, that when it proved itself (only) to
be an intelligent, superbly well-made, largely effective horror thriller, I was
disappointed.
And from the feel of things, so was the opening night audience. The
electric tension that greeted the film’s early scenes over time gave way to a funny
kind of mistrustful hesitancy in not knowing how to respond to the minimum
horror and maximum attention to visual style. Let down by the film’s lack of
cover-your-eyes scares, the eager-to-be-entertained audience instead zeroed in on
the burlesque of Jack Nicholson’s performance. As Nicholson trotted out the
entirety of his even-then overfamiliar arsenal of arched eyebrows, Cheshire cat
grins, and baroque overplaying, the audience assuaged its sense of letdown by
losing itself in the film's mood-killing, dubiously intentional black comedy.
Taking their cue from an actor who didn’t appear to be taking things
seriously himself, the audience started to find everything
Nicholson did funny. Even when he wasn’t trying to be. The Shining began to pick up and find its rhythm by the latter third, but by then the audience had already been lost. The crowd leaving the theater that night was a considerably more subdued and bewildered one than had entered. By the end of the 3-day Memorial Day Weekend, word of mouth had more or less undermined
all the good the trailer and the film’s sizable advertising budget had done, and The Shining limped along for the rest of the summer, a modest
success, eclipsed at the boxoffice—proportionately by budget—by that other summer horror film release of 1980 (God help us), Friday the
13th.
Ultimately, time, cable TV, home video, and the overall decline in the quality of horror films over the years, has allowed for a more clear-eyed, fair-handed assessment of The Shining’s virtues. Today it is widely regarded as a minor classic and one of Kubrick's most highly regarded films. Me, I like it a little more every time I see it, finding it easier to appreciate what Kubrick was trying to do when I no longer filter it through what I wanted him to do.
Ultimately, time, cable TV, home video, and the overall decline in the quality of horror films over the years, has allowed for a more clear-eyed, fair-handed assessment of The Shining’s virtues. Today it is widely regarded as a minor classic and one of Kubrick's most highly regarded films. Me, I like it a little more every time I see it, finding it easier to appreciate what Kubrick was trying to do when I no longer filter it through what I wanted him to do.
WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THIS FILM
Stanley Kubrick is perhaps a little too removed a director to engage me
emotionally in the way necessary for me to be made to feel real fear (the way
Roman Polanski can), but there is something ideally chilling in the setup of a vaguely
dysfunctional family holed up for an entire winter in an isolated hotel that
may or may not be haunted. Where Kubrick really excels is in creating indelible
images (the elevator scene alone qualifies the film for classic status),
developing tension, and establishing a world wherein events proceed on a
collision course of horror that feels devilishly preordained, yet the
particulars of what is real and why it’s all happening are open to any number
of interpretations. Letting his meticulously evoked intermingling of the
paranormal and the supernatural propel the plot, The Shining is almost willful in its ambiguity. (And don’t let anyone convince you that there is a
single “right” way to interpret The
Shining. Part of the film's brilliance - and no small part of its frustration to many - is how well it supports many different,
perfectly valid interpretations.)
The Torrances: One big, happy family. |
PERFORMANCES
Jack Nicholson has been a star for so long that it’s easy to forget that
in the years following his 1975 Oscar win for One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, many thought that Nicholson had
fallen victim to the dreaded “Oscar Curse” (later dubbed The F. Murray Abraham
Syndrome)— a downward-trajectory jinx that befalls the careers of many Academy
Award winners. Jack Nicholson’s hammy and/or ineffectual turns in the late 70s
flops The Missouri Breaks, The Last Tycoon & Goin' South, played like dry-runs for his
over-the-top performance in The Shining,
and critics were less than kind. Until just recently, I’ve always felt that Nicholson
single-handedly ruined The Shining
and that Kubrick afforded him far too much leeway (as he did Peter Sellers in Lolita). Even today I can’t say that I’m
fully persuaded by Nicholson in the role, but I’ve since warmed up to his
particular acting “choices” for his portrayal of Jack Torrance. The common complaint that Nicholson's Jack Torrance looks plenty crazy before he's even driven insane in The Shining echo a similar grievance leveled at the choice of actor John Cassavetes for the husband in Rosemary's Baby. To critics in 1968, Cassavetes looked guilty of something before his character even did anything.
On the flip side of my feelings about Jack Nicholson is my affection
for the popularly-unpopular choice of actress Shelley Duvall. I think she is terrific in The Shining and any emotional engagement I have in the film at all is attributable to her pitch-perfect performance. Perhaps I’m
prejudiced, but I’ve liked Duvall in everything I’ve seen her in…especially her
Oscar-worthy work in Robert
Altman’s 3 Women (1977).
THE STUFF OF FANTASY
The Overlook Hotel as envisioned by Kubrick and his team is one creepily spectacular location for a horror film.
THE STUFF OF DREAMS
As opposed to what I enjoy most about good horror films, The Shining never hits me where I live in terms of tapping into some deep-seated fear and giving it a face. The single scene that accomplishes this is the brilliant "All work and no play" reveal of Jack Torrance's insanity (which hit me with the same jolt that the Scrabble anagram sequence in Rosemary's Baby did). What I think The Shining has that keeps me returning to it and what has caused it to consistently rise in my estimation, is that it's terribly smart and thoughtful in its construction. There are worse things you can say about a horror movie than that it is one of ideas.
The Shining has perhaps more head than heart, but its predetermination has an intrigue and attraction all its own. Whether it feels like a treatise on the eternal nature of evil, a dramatization of domestic violence, or just a vision of a family going mad together, it makes me want to watch every corner of the frame, listen to every detail of dialog, literally scour the film from start to finish in hopes of uncovering the "key" to what it all signifies. In the end, The Shining may not have much to say about the many questions it proposes, but a movie that provokes thought, any kind of thought, is always a step in the right direction.
Much like Stanley Kubrick's most revered film, "2001: A Space Odyssey", I feel that "The Shining" gives itself very well to repeat viewings and multiple interpretations. I'm fortunate to have seen this several times at the cinema. It definitely becomes more intriguing with each viewing. If there's one thing that I love about "The Shining", "2001" and "A Clockwork Orange", it's the ultra-stylish interior design. Apart from Jack Nicholson and Shelley Duvall, I think Philip Stone (he played Alex's dad in "A Clockwork Orange" and also appeared in "Barry Lyndon", thus making him the only person to act in three successive Stanley Kubrick films)is superb here as Delbert Grady. Delbert's chillingly-delivered pejorative for Dick Hallorann (Scatman Crothers) is something I still find downright disturbing.
ReplyDeleteI would also like to call attention to the excellent article by Michael Dare, entitled "Five Things You Probably Didn't Notice in The Shining". I especially love the second one, about the influence of television in modern society. It's well worth a read. Michael has obviously studied this film in tremendous detail.
Speaking for myself, Jack isn't the funniest thing in the film--it's Danny talking to his finger in that croaky voice! Also, I think that Shelley Duvall is amazing here--you'd be hard pressed to imagine a better performance in the role of Wendy than what you get here.
Lots of Kubrick trademarks here, such as the over-the-top "terrified face" that Danny pulls--Patrick Magee does the same thing when he hears Alex in the bath doing his rendition of "Singin' in The Rain" in "A Clockwork Orange". Also, Stanley seemed to be fond of those quick zooms long after they became a 1970s film cliche (he still favoured them in "Full Metal Jacket", his next film after "The Shining"). It's actually one of my favourite film techniques. Few people did it quite like Stanley, and it's a pity that you don't really see it much from more recent films.
As Stanley progressed throughout his work in film, he made films less often. It was a quality-not-quantity approach. Cinema would be much better these days if numerous other filmmakers adopted this philosophy.
Hi Mark
DeleteThanks so much for sharing your comments on the film. It says a lot about the ultimate effectiveness of "The Shining" that so many people have their favorite sequences, performances, and impressions. Thanks for the tip on the article. I read it at your recommendation. Kubrick's films are wonderful looking on the big screen. And of course you get points for liking Duvall in the film!
I have the shining extended cut with the hospital scene intact on 35mm film with lots of other deleted scene & lots of deleted sequences
DeleteSounds like a collector's dream! It's nice to know that SOMEONE has them, rather than learning that they have been lost or destroyed in some forgotten vault. Also, it
Deletehelps that someone out there can correct any urban legends or misremembered details related to the what was shot and later deleted. Thanks!
For me, the most unsettling or otherwise effective scenes in "The Shining" are the ones where a simple action - riding a pedal car through a hallway, walking into a hotel bathroom, sitting down at a bar - is suddenly steeped in mystery.
ReplyDeleteDanny pedaling that car was beautifully done; not only the actual filming, but the difference in sound as the car rolled over carpeting, over hardwood, again over carpeting...and all the while with the threat of some hidden menace. I love it when Danny realizes he's just gone past room 237, and he stops and looks back. Afraid, and curious. Me too.
Jack walking into 237's bathroom later on (on the hunt for trouble), looking from some distance (it's a big bathroom) at the tub, and seeing the shower curtain slowly being pulled back - to me, that's definitely something of what all the hype for the movie promised. Just as we did with Danny looking at the door, we're now looking with Jack (hardly able to believe our eyes) at a woman, a beautiful statuesque woman, looking right back at him. She can't possibly be there, but there she is.
Her unspoken exit from the tub, with the creepy music and the antiseptic look of the room and the lighting - I can play it in my head any time I want (I've never found any personal info anywhere regarding her, who she was, how she got the part), it's so completely absorbing. The fact that, in the midst of their kiss, she suddenly becomes old and horrible is really only jarring the first time or two you see it. The real power of that scene for me resides in Jack and us seeing the young woman not only leave the tub with the grace of a dancer, but to be actually sitting there in the first place!
And I like those scenes in the ballroom with Jack and Lloyd - another intrusion of the unexpected that I've enjoyed so much in Stephen King's work. They aren't simply for the effect of dead one minute and full of life the next. They're instances where Jack opens up, the way you do at a bar, confiding in Lloyd who has a superior place in the relationship. They very much help tell the story.
Those are great examples you give. I think you're correct in detailing what "The Shining" does very well; that is, in creating a sense of unease around simple activities that have within them elements of the fantastic. The ghosts and apparitions in the film appear with the same matter-of-fact clarity as real events. So much so that a real tension is created. As you indicate, the mere fact that some of these things shouldn't be happening, yet are happening just the same, challenge our equilibrium. Thanks for the thoughtful observations!
DeleteKen,
ReplyDeleteI'd read "The Shining" before seeing the movie and was very disappointed in Kubrick's adaptation. I'm no Stephen King fan, but I did think he did a good job on "The Shining." Perhaps, because Kubrick directed, my expectations were too high. It seemed to me that Nicholson camped it up to the point of the ridiculous. And the casting of Shelley Duvall did little offset Nicholson's campiness. Also didn't care for the change Kubrick made to the story's climax. Interestingly, I was just recently talking to a friend about "Lolita," mostly about James Mason's mesmerizing and genius performance as Humbert Humbert. But I had to add that I thought Peter Sellers' unrelenting comedic insanity was too much and almost ruined the film.
I haven't seen "The Shining" since it arrived on the scene, but you've piqued my curiosity - perhaps it's not as bad as I thought!?! Maybe I should take another look...
Hi Eve
DeleteI only read "The Shining" after seeing the film, and, oddly enough, the book made me appreciate the film more.
In some ways I would say that for me, a film adaptation of King's book has yet to be made (please avoid the TV movie!)and Kubrick's film is more enjoyable when seen as a wholly independent work. I agree with you about Nicholson's performance, which is self-indulgent and a mood-killer. But I adore Shelley Duvall here (no objectivity here, though, purely subjective affection).
Had you asked me in 1980 if I liked "The Shining" I would have said no, but I swear the film just gets better for me as time goes by. Divorced from any expectation of it being faithful to King's book, it plays like a very good, stylish suspense thriller for me.
I have a feeling you'd still feel the same about the film (your reasons for not liking it are so well-founded) but I would love to know if seeing it again would change any opinions. And yes, Peter Sellers, to me, is the thing that stands in the way from "Lolita" being the full-on classic James Masons performance makes it.
My experience has been that I've always been better off reading a book after I've seen a film. It can be such a handicap seeing a film made from a beloved book and struggling to let go of expectations.
Really enjoying hearing your thoughts on these films!
I saw this as a child (I'm in my 30's now) and was completely, indelibly terrified- almost in a scarred-for-life sort of way. The man in the dog-costume was somehow the worst part of all- the total inscrutability of it made my head spin.
ReplyDelete20+ years passed without my impressions being challenged or modified at all (I guess the only people I ever talked to about it had similar experiences)- then I rewatched it (in a theater) for the first time a few months ago. I could hardly believe what I was seeing! It was about the least scary, most ridiculous horror movie I'd ever seen. Jack Nicholson was bananas. It was a pretty complicated viewing experience: aside from the jarring contrast with my own memories, I felt vaguely heretical, like I was deviating from the whole global consensus that this was the most terrifying movie ever made. I was reluctant to admit even to myself how silly the whole thing was. A very strange experience.
Hi Thomas
DeleteLoved your "personal experience" comment ! So perfectly summarizes the odd way films can appear so different to us as time goes by. Your experience with "The Shining" reflects my own with "Hush, Hush Sweet Charlotte"...a film that, as a child, nearly traumatized me, and one i held the belief was upsettingly, disturbingly terrifying. Of course, I revisit it as an adult and I'm actually hard-pressed to even access what it was I thought was so scary. As with your experience of "The Shining", I was confronted with a very silly (albeit enjoyable) movie. What happened?
Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to contribute such a well-observed comment!
My pleasure Ken- I love stumbling onto smart passionate blogs like this one (...already can't remember how I got here...)
DeleteGreat article, brings back loads of memories. Attended a midnight showing in the main theatre, was simply brilliant.
ReplyDeleteThank you! In my dotage I don't tend to get as worked up over new movie releases like I used to, but I do enjoy remembering back to when "The Shining" felt like an "event" movie to see. No matter what one felt about the film, seeing it on the big screen, amidst all the hoopla, was quite a heady experience.
DeleteThanks for reading the post and taking the time to comment!
Ooooh! So you saw the legendary extended ending! What a lucky guy!
ReplyDeleteMe and my sibilings finally had our Halloween Session with 3 movies: Carrie, Halloween and The Shining. They only liked Halloween (wich is my least favorite of the trio). They tought it was really slow and couldn't connect. I wanted to tell them what I lved about it but that would sufocate their own experience so I just enjoyed it silently.
I love this movie, I read the book first so I really thought Kubrick was a genius to twist the story like he did here by keeping it more "grounded", more about insanity than about spirits. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter if Danny can see the future or not, or if Jack is a devil or whatever, the man is the real monster, the fear of what the other can do to us is the real threat.
I'm not really fond of Jackson's performance but I'm actually not a big fan of his. I respect his history and could never act better than him but I think his performances overlap too much and I always end up thinking they're the same character. Still, his acting in Terms of Endearment was amazing.
Shelley Duvall is one of my favorite actress ever, unfairly underrated and does a lot in this movie. Her performance is layered (When she's talking to the psychologist and gives that uncomfortable smile when has to talk about Jack's violent past) and she really carries it for me. Some people think she's just too weak or annoying but I think she's like most of the housewifes I knew as a kid. Glad to be a mother, glad to help her husband, submissive and mostly silent, but also resilient, can stand a lot more pressure than her male partner and even though would never attack anyone she could resist any blow just because she loves her kid. I don't think Wendy in the movie could've survived wasn't she a mother. She always looks like she's gonna pass out at anytime but she keeps standing for Danny.
The Overlook to me is the greatest character. It looks like it's alive (it's colors and the angle it's walls are portrayed) and it's indifferent to the characters suffering, so I think that's why I'm always scared by Danny's walks by it's hallways, cause feels like the hallways are watching him. When Wendy tries to escape by the window it seems to me that the hotel itself didn't want to let her go, I'm thrilled just by the memory of that scene! I love that third act! (Actually the third act really feels more like a thriller than horror. The movie plays it's supernatural cards at the very beginning and we end up terrified by the rest of the movie.)
I wish I could understand movies better cause it looks like I miss a lot of what's happening here. The colors in the rooms, the camera angles, the composition of each scene. Kubrick put a lot of thought in it and I think I understand a little more each time, but never scratched the surface.
ps. I'm not a horror kind of person, but my favorite 2016 movie so far is "The Witch". It borrows a lot from "The Shining" in terms of writing, pace, atmosphere and even soundtrack, but it's really good by it's own terms.
pps. Today I woke up to the news that Shelley will be on a tb show talking about her mental illness. It made me really sad because she's not only sick, but as most people on twitter are already saying, she's being perversely exploited. I love my favorite actors and like to think they're somewhere being happy and amazing, so it made me real sad to see her vulnerable like this.
Hello
ReplyDeleteSounds like your Halloween screening represented some of the best of the genre (I too have to say i'm not overly fond of "Halloween" it comes in third with the titles you listed).
As for THE SHINING you're one of the few I've encountered who read the book first and wan't disappointed by the film.
I loved your assessment of Jack Nicholson, which is, to my eye, really spot on. I think he's a marvelous actor, but he's also a star (in the mold of Katherine Hepburn, etc...where their distinct personalities dominate no matter what the role), and that overlap you speak of really IS there in a great many of his roles. I just don't recall it ever being expressed so succinctly.
Shelley Duvall is one of my favorites as well, and I think she is an inspired bit of casting here. I'm often surprised that so many find her character more annoying than Nicholson's hammy performance.
By the way, I'm also one of those saddened to hear of her current struggle with metal illness and I concur that she is being exploited by that Phil character. I just hope the attention brought to her circumstances gets her the help she needs.
You say you wish you understood film better,- I think you understand film a good deal better than a lot of people actually employed in the industry. I think watching film is like learning a language, you're not going to getthe subtleties of tone and accent right away, but the more films you watch, the more you think about them, the more fluent you become in the language of film. At least you grasp that there is more to be gleaned than a couple of hours killed staring at a screen. Movies can be very enriching, and it seems you understand that very well.
I don't see a lot of horror films (not from lack of desire, I just find few that interest me). i might check out THE WITCH, as I'm unfamiliar with it.
Thanks again for taking so much time to comment and share your thoughts on THE SHINING. You always have a lot of well-thought-out insights to contribute.
Hi, Ken!
DeleteIt took me a long time to realize what was bothering me about Nocholson's performances. I'm glad you see that too cause I don't see people talking about it and I tought I was alone on that boat.
I too hope Shelley can find a way and recover her sanity or at least find some peace of mind. Too bad she got recognized only as The Shining actress, when she had 30+ years as an actress and a producer and television host career.
Thank you for your kind words! I really want to understando movies better so I'll keep on watching a lot! :D
I don't have mixed feelings about The Shining. I thought it was a masterpiece in 1980 and I still feel that way today. The movie's greatest set piece is the "All Work and No Play Makes Jack a Dull Boy" scene climaxing with Shelley wacking Jack with a baseball bat at the top of the stairs: one continuous, amazing shot. Duvall is great in the movie and so is Danny Lloyd. You never catch him acting: he just is this sad, withdrawn little boy. Nice to know he never acted again but instead became a well-adjusted, happily married teacher.
ReplyDeleteYes, Duvall is superb in this. And it's true, Lloyd being such a natural is a huge asset to the film. There's footage of him on YouTube from 2019 and some of his appearances at Horror conventions and the like. It's interesting hearing how much he remembers about the shooting and learning th degree to which he was sheltered from knowing what was really going on.
DeleteI love this film, it is creepy and scary because of its minimalism - the scare is watching Jack descend into madness because he wants it - he hates his family and can't face it in reality.
ReplyDeleteI feel much the same. So many of my favorite horror films, those I regard as genuinely creepy and disturbing, are rooted in very simple, psychologically minimalist ideas. Family (Burnt Offerings), Identity (The Stepford Wives), Faith (The Exorcist), Body Autonomy (Rosemary's Baby).
Delete