When most people think of cinema in the '70s, they think of a
time of innovation, upheaval, and experimentation. And indeed, it was. But the '70s was also the decade that introduced the first generation of film-weaned
filmmakers. The directors, producers, and writers who grew up watching movies.
Wholly uninterested in the experimental exploration of film's
potential as an art form or means of creative expression, this new breed of nostalgia-prone, rear-view-fixated
filmmakers—many of them former movie critics or film scholars—not only seemed to have spent the entirety of their formative years in front of movie screens (suggesting, perhaps, a lack of actual, real-life-acquired insights to impart in their work beyond those
gleaned, secondhand, from movies); but when granted the opportunity to make films of their own, strove for no ambition
loftier than to remake, revisit, and re-imagine the movies that meant so much to
them while growing up.
The legacy of such willfully arrested artistic development in today's Hollywood can most certainly be seen in the industry's worrisome over-reliance on remakes and
reboots and the almost-surreal global dominance of mega-budget, adolescence-coddling
comic book superhero movies. But back in the day of the Auteur Theory, Nouvelle
Vague, and the New Hollywood, the regressive filmmaker was primarily dismissed by so-called serious cineastes. Luckily for these filmmakers, they were taken to the bosom of a moviegoing public growing weary of avant-garde filmmaking techniques, artsy pretensions, and non-linear storytelling. Indeed, in the wake of the '70s oil crisis,
inflation, Vietnam, and Watergate, many audiences found the notion of escaping into the romanticized idealization of the past to be a very appealing proposition.
 |
| Cinema Dreams In the background of this shot, Bogdanovich pays tribute to one of his favorite directors, John Ford, by featuring a theater marquee advertising Ford's 1935 feature, Steamboat Round the Bend |
Some directors, like François Truffaut, paid homage to the
filmmakers they admired (Hitchcock, in his case) by reinterpreting that director's style through a
modern prism. Others, like Francis Ford Coppola, found fame by applying auteurist theories to classicist filmmaking. Only Peter
Bogdanovich—actor, film scholar, and critic—drew the ire of Hollywood
Renaissance movie cultists (while gaining success as the Golden Boy of the nostalgia craze) by making new "old"
movies.
 |
| Ryan O'Neal as Moses (Moze) Pray |
 |
| Tatum O'Neal as Addie Loggins |
 |
| Madeline Kahn as Miss Trixie Delight (alias, Mademoiselle) |
 |
| P.J. Johnson as Imogene |
 |
| Burton Gilliam as Floyd |
.JPG "John Hillerman") |
| John Hillerman as Deputy Hardin / Jess Hardin |
 |
| Randy Quaid as Leroy |
Although Peter Bogdanovich is technically credited with
being its director, Paper Moon, like its
predecessors The Last Picture Show (1971)
and What's Up, Doc? (1972), is a film
so heavily influenced by Howard Hawks, John Ford, and Orson Welles, each
gentleman, by rights, could share co-director billing. A point Bogdanovich himself
would likely make no bones about, for on the DVD commentary, he states, "The movie was very 1935 with '70s actors." And to be sure, what with the film's salty
language, racy humor, and a pint-sized, cigarette-smoking heroine so cheeky she'd
take the curl out of Shirley Temple's hair; Paper
Moon feels very much like some kind of pre-Code Preston Sturges movie shot
through with a dose of '70s self-awareness.
Paper Moon, a Depression-era
road comedy skillfully and hilariously adapted by Alvin Sargent (The Sterile Cuckoo) from Joe David
Brown's 1971 novel Addie Pray, is the
story of small-time con man Moses Pray (Ryan O'Neal), who meets his match in
little Addie Loggins (Ryan's real-life daughter, Tatum O'Neal), an old-beyond-her-8-years,
recently-orphaned waif who may or may
not be his illegitimate daughter. Entrusted with escorting the child from
Kansas to Missouri to stay with relatives, Moze's attempt to first swindle, then
unburden himself of the cagey tyke results in the tables being turned on him
in a manner ultimately binding the two as reluctant partners in cross-country
flim-flams. The quarrelsome duo's misadventures swindling widows, bilking shopkeepers,
and taking up with buxom carnival dancer Trixie Delight (Kahn) and her beleaguered
maid, Imogene (Johnson), are played out against a bleak Midwestern landscape of
barren skies and vast Kansas plains redolent of The Grapes of Wrath.
 |
| Paper Moon's grim depiction of the Midwest during The Great Depression not only served as dark subtext to the film's comedy, but resonated with '70s audiences contending with gas-rationing and rising inflation |
Gloriously shot, cleverly conceived, superbly acted, and consistently laugh-out-loud funny, Paper Moon is a feast of period detail and sharp comedy writing that manages to be sweetly sentimental without veering into the saccharine. And while I find the film to be a little draggy in its third act (perhaps because things take a darker turn), the first two-thirds of Paper Moon is very nearly perfect.
Following a tight, 3-act structure, Paper Moon, with the introduction of Trixie and Imogene to the narrative in the second act, reaches such a giddy height of comedy incandescence that the film never fully regains its footing once they depart. These characters bring so much variance to the interplay of Moze and Addie that when nothing is there to take its place but a sinister bootlegger and a fistfighting hillbilly, one can almost feel the air leaving the movie. Almost. The O'Neal chemistry is too strong to let the film flounder completely.
 |
| The Only Time We See Addie's Mother (and we understand why Addie is so attached to that cloche hat) |
If it can be said of Bogdanovich that he is a director who has spent his life forever at the feet of The Masters, then at least he's a student who learned his lessons well. For as with all of his early films, Paper Moon reveals Bogdanovich to be a deft and sensitive storyteller, versatile and fluent in the language of cinema. He understands what he's doing, knows what he's going for, and, despite a film-geek tendency toward stylistic imitation-as-flattery, has an inspired touch when it comes to comedy. Rare among nostalgists, Bogdanovich has a talent for making the familiar feel engagingly fresh.
WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THIS FILM
Paper Moon is one
of my favorite comedies, one I've always regretted never having seen at a theater
in the presence of an audience. But as I recount in an earlier post on this blog about The Last Picture Show, as a young man, I was
less than enthralled by the whole '70s nostalgia craze:
"As an African-American teen inspired by the
emerging prominence of Black actors on the screen and excited about the upsurge
in positive depictions of African-American life in movies of the 70s; these
retro films, with their all-white casts and dreamy idealization of a time in America's
past which was, in all probability, a living nightmare for my parents and
grandparents, felt like a step in the wrong direction. The antennae of my
adolescent cynicism told me that all this rear-view fetishism
was just Hollywood's way of maintaining the status quo. A way of reverting back
to traditional gender and racial roles, and avoiding the unwieldy game-change
presented by the demand for more ethnic diversity onscreen, the evolving role
of women in society, and the increased visibility of gays."
And while I still feel this to be true and witness the same
thing happening today in Hollywood's focus on fantasy films populated with mythical
creatures, elves, gnomes, wizards, and superbeings of all stripes (anything but
those pesky, problematic people of color); the passage of time has literally transformed Paper Moon into what it was always designed
to be: an old movie. And old movies I can watch through a prism of the past I'd
otherwise find unacceptable, if not reprehensible, in a contemporary film.
I think it was Bogdanovich who once made the observation that people of a certain age visualize the 1930s in their mind's eye as a black-and-white era because that's the only way they know it; through black-and-white-photos, black-and-white movies. When Paper Moon, with its meticulous recreation of the look and feel of a 1935 movie (which is, importantly, not the same thing as recreating real life in 1935), has its very period-specific characters using language unthinkable in films of the day, the visual and behavioral incongruity is riotously funny.
 |
| Ryan's Daughter |
PERFORMANCES
As everyone knows, 10-year-old Tatum O'Neal made history by
being the youngest person to ever win a competitive Oscar when she won Best
Supporting Actress for Paper Moon in
1974. And on that score, you'll get no argument from me. I'm really not very fond
of kids (either on or off-screen), a predisposition compounded by Hollywood's fascination with precocious
kids whose mature behavior I'm supposed to find adorable. But Bogdanovich works
a minor miracle with Tatum O'Neal. She actually IS an adorable, precocious child…sweet
of face, husky of voice, and inhabited, apparently, by the soul of a 50-year-old
grifter.
 |
| Paper Moon's great, unsung asset is Ryan O'Neal. Looser and funnier than you're likely to see him in any other film, he is a real charmer with an impressive range of exasperated reactions |
Tatum O'Neal is nothing short of a marvel in a role in which she's required to play a range of emotions a seasoned professional would find challenging. And even if the rumors are true that Bogdanovich shaped every gesture, nuance, and line reading (easy enough to believe given the flatness of her subsequent performances in The Bad News Bears and International Velvet), hers is still an amazingly assured and natural performance for one so young (O'Neal was eight when filming began).
Now, with all that being said, I do have to lodge my one complaint:
there is no way in hell Addie Pray is a supporting role. It's a lead. The
entire film rests on her shoulders, and she appears in more scenes than anyone
else in the film. It's patently absurd that Tatum O'Neal was entered in the Best
Supporting Actress category.
Of course, my rant is based on my ironclad certainty that,
taking absolutely nothing from O'Neal's great performance, it was Madeline Kahn who deserved that award. As good as Paper
Moon is, my A+ rating would drop to a B-minus without Kahn's Trixie Delight. She's that good.
THE STUFF OF FANTASY
The off-kilter charm of Paper
Moon is in it essentially being a romantic comedy. An uneasy love story
between a father and daughter who may or may not be biologically related ("It's pothible!"). That Addie doesn't
really see herself as a little girl and Moze not seeing himself as anything closely
resembling a father, makes for several amusingly awkward scenes where the querulous
duo is forced to play-act the roles of loving father and daughter in order to perpetrate
a swindle. Scenes made all the more touching by all the other times we see them reluctant to yield to even the slightest display
of affection for one another.
 |
| Waitress - "How we doin', Angel Pie? We gonna have a little dessert after we finish up our hot dog?" Addie - (never taking her eyes off Moze) "I dunno." Waitress - "What d'ya say, Daddy? Whyn'y we get precious here a little dessert if she eats her dog?" Moze - (slowly and through gritted teeth) "Her name ain't precious." |
 |
| Two days and 36 takes (!) produced this exceptional continuous shot sequence |
THE STUFF OF DREAMS
Over the years, Peter Bogdanovich's unrealized potential as a director and the dysfunctional family circus that has become the O'Neals has lent a bittersweet air of nostalgia to Paper Moon that's wholly unintentional and unrelated to the film's roots in 1930s wistfulness. For years it had been hinted that Bogdanovich's success was significantly reliant upon his wife, production, and costume designer, Polly Platt. Paper Moon marks their last collaboration (they divorced after Peter fell in love with Cybill Shepherd during the making of The Last Picture Show) and, perhaps tellingly, the end of Bogdanovich's success streak. As a longtime admirer (if not idolater) of Orson Welles, it couldn't have been lost on Bogdanovich the degree to which his drop in popularity mirrored Welles' own tarnished Golden Boy career decline.
When I watch the classic TV show, I Love Lucy, it often crosses my mind that I'm watching a wish-fulfillment version of the real-life marriage of Lucille Ball & Desi Arnaz. In light of the painful reality we've come to know about the relationship of the O'Neals, Moze and Addie have become, for me, the idealized image of Ryan and Tatum.
As I do with Orson Welles, I always associate Peter Bogdanovich with the genius work of his early career and largely overlook his latter contributions. And while I know it to be a departure from the sad reality, I like to imagine Tatum and Ryan O'Neal driving off to an uncertain but happy future together, devoted father and loving daughter, down that long and winding road into the horizon.
Isn't nostalgia all about remembering the past as we would have liked it to be?
 |
| And They Lived Happily Ever After |
BONUS MATERIAL
On the DVD commentary, Bogdanovich reveals that it was his friend Orson Welles who came up with the idea to title the film "Paper Moon." Before the property fell into Bogdanovich's hands, the film was still known as "Addie Pray" (the title of the Joe David Brown novel) and conceived as a project for Paul Newman and his daughter Nell, working under the direction of John Huston.
YouTube clip of Tatum O'Neal winning her Oscar for Paper Moon - HERE
 |
| In 1974, Paper Moon was turned into a short-lived TV series starring Jodie Foster (just two years away from her own Oscar nomination in Taxi Driver) and Christopher Connelly, the actor who played Ryan O'Neal's brother in 1964's popular TV soap opera Peyton Place (itself a spin-off of a motion picture). YouTube Clip of the series' opening sequence. |
 |
| Newspaper ad - Paper Moon had its World Premiere at the Coronet Theater in New York on Wednesday, May 16, 1973 |
.JPG "Reginald Gardiner")
