When it comes to The Fountainhead, I wish there was a way for me to return my mind back to the state of blissful ignorance I
enjoyed the first time I saw this amazing film. That was many years ago. Back
when The Fountainhead’s chief attractions for me were director King
Vidor’s overripe, purple-prose approach to the material―a style always threatening
to soar even more over-the-top than his notorious sex-and-sand opus, Duel in
the Sun (1946)―and the overheated, over-emphatic screenplay by famed author,
Ayn Rand, adapted from her hefty novel.
The plot of The
Fountainhead: ruggedly individualistic architect Howard Roarke (Gary
Cooper, still sexy, but looking a tad careworn at only 47) doing battle against a
world of cartoonishly single-minded villains hell-bent on commodifying his
genius—was always less interesting than its presentation. What I took delight
in was The Fountainhead's dramatic persuasiveness: the application of a patently theatrical, artificial method of acting to a script of arch,
over-embellished dialog, all in service of an extravagantly overwrought
post-German Expressionist visual style. Ayn Rand’s verbose, almost feverishly
nonsensical novel resisted any kind of realistic adaptation. King Vidor, never once rooting the film in any recognizable reality, managed to fashion a compellingly excessive
film that served her work well.
| Gary Cooper as Howard Roark |
| Patricia Neal as Dominique Francon |
| Raymond Massey as Gail Wynand |
| Robert Douglas as Ellsworth Toohey |
As a dyed-in-the-wool visual aesthete whose lifelong
relationship with film has been a battle with the influence of style over
substance, I’m aware that my fondness for The
Fountainhead has little to do with a sober assessment of its merits and
faults as a story. I’m nuts about the movie chiefly because its visual style is so intoxicatingly curated. I respond on an almost visceral level to how dazzling it is to look at, and I marvel at how closely the performances, in all their profound solemnity, hew to that mannered, posturing style so expertly played for laughs in those old Carol Burnett Show movie spoofs. Indeed, in all the areas where The Fountainhead seems to overplay its hand (it makes its points early and easily, then goes on to reiterate those same points, ad nauseum, scene after scene), I don’t fault the film so much as chalk it up to a particular type of broad-strokes, post-war American filmmaking.
The window of the past can do that…things you’d find
unforgivably false in a film today look perfectly acceptable in a black &
white film from the late '40s.
Examples of The Fountainhead's breathtaking cinematography (Robert Burks) and art direction (Edward Carrere).
Well, that’s how things started for me and how things
remained for some time. Unfamiliar with Ayn Rand or her philosophy (in any
direct way), I was content to revel in The
Fountainhead’s overwrought romantic melodrama and ravishing imagery with nary
a thought given to its portentous themes. Themes that, even as a callow youth,
struck me as slightly sophomoric.
When, many years later, I finally got around to reading The Fountainhead, I was actually surprised, given its reputation, by what a windy polemic against Collectivism (the social philosophy that prioritizes group effort over the work of the individual) I found it to be. I enjoyed the novel’s descriptive passages very much and welcomed the fleshing out of the film’s slim characterizations, but felt its central plot was virtually buried beneath a lot of ideological redundancy. Still, given how intrigued I was by Rand's penchant for narrative overkill, I can't say I didn't enjoy the novel. So much so that I ventured forth to tackle her last and most famous novel, Atlas Shrugged. Bad move.
I won’t turn this post into a diatribe against Objectivism (it's the narcissist's bible: the philosophy of self-interest) or the unfortunate adoption of Atlas Shrugged and Rand’s philosophies by so many of America’s most prominent sociopaths. But let’s just say that when it came to learning more about Ayn Rand’s philosophical beliefs, more proved to be decidedly less.
WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THIS FILM
Before I'd read The Fountainhead, it never crossed my mind that the film adaptation was, in some ways, little
more than a visual-aid lecture on Objectivism. I just thought it was a great-looking movie saddled with an overly obvious, poorly written screenplay. In viewing the film from Rand’s perspective,
I can well imagine why she despised it; the power of King Vidor’s images overwhelms
her words.
And it's a good thing, too, because The Fountainhead is a real “movie lover’s” movie. By that, I don’t mean lovers of good film; I mean folks who love the stylized artificiality of film. Realism in film has its place, but films that speak to us through metaphor and symbolism (a good example is Charles Laughton’s The Night of the Hunter) benefit greatly from the visual magic of modernism and the aesthetic drama of German Expressionism. The Fountainhead is such a film.
It’s full of gorgeous cinematography, sumptuous sets, movie stars who look like movie stars, fabulous costumes, and soap-opera emotions. That none of it bears the slightest resemblance to human life as we know it only adds to its charm.
![]() |
| The Fountainhead had its Gala Premiere at the Warner Theater in Hollywood on Thursday, June 23, 1949 |
PERFORMANCES
I’ve always liked Patricia Neal. Her unadorned earthiness in Elia Kazan’s A Face in the Crowd (1957) and Martin Ritt’s Hud (1963) was the best thing about those films. In a sea of lacquered, blonde bombshells, Neal was a home-grown Anna Magnani, reminding us that sex appeal
didn’t require a bullet bra and the disavowal of intelligence. Familiar only with latter-day Neal, imagine my surprise in seeing her at 22, given
the full Hollywood-glam treatment in The
Fountainhead, her second film. She looks really stunning throughout.
Cast as The Fountainhead's sole female character, Dominique Francon (was a time you’d have to open
a novel by Sidney Sheldon or Jackie Collins to find a name like that), Neal is first seen heaving a Greek statue out of the window of her
high-rise apartment because, “I wanted to destroy it rather than let it be part
of a world where beauty and genius and greatness have no chance!”
And if you think there’s not an actress on earth who
can pull off dialogue like that, well, you’re right. It’s just the first of
several scenes where Neal strives mightily against some of the strangest human
dialogue ever committed to the page and forced to be uttered onscreen. She’s not always successful, but she’s never less than fascinating to watch. Juggling numerous lovers and a multitude of hard-to-fathom motives, Neal's Dominique Francon manages to be glacially aloof and sexually
agitated at the same time.
The character of Dominique Francon is a woman of high ideals who, before finding her spiritual equal in the noble Howard Roark, feels frustrated by having
to live in a world that worships mediocrity. She vents her frustration by engaging in behavior favored
by smart and successful women to this day: she intentionally becomes involved
with inferior men.
She chose her fiancé, the weak-willed Peter Keating, because
“He was the most safely unimportant person I could find.” She later weds hack newspaperman Gail Wynand to make good on her
promise, “If I ever decide to punish myself for some terrible guilt, I’ll marry
you.”
Dominique is nothing if not a gal with a few issues she
needs to work out.
| Obsessing over Howard Roark's drill |
THE STUFF OF FANTASY
Shave off all the whiskers and fluff from Rand’s one-sided
proselytizing, and The Fountainhead is a
pretty satisfying triangular love story with a few interesting things to say
about society. The rather unconventional romance between Dominique and Howard (controversially
incited in the novel by an off-putting rape, but, thanks to the usual stylistic
obfuscation of sex in Production Code-era Hollywood, comes off in the film as the usual yes/no, male/female roundelay) is lent
credence by the palpable chemistry between real-life lovers Gary Cooper and Patricia Neal.
Any salient points Rand tries to make about the dangers of a society committed to the lowest common denominator (are you listening, Michael Bay, Vin Diesel, and Adam Sandler?) lack bite because, narratively, the deck is so heavily stacked in Roark's favor. With the villains depicted as simplistic paper tigers, there's virtually no conflict. And Gary Cooper (not the most expressive actor when it comes to dialogue) is asked to reiterate his character’s position so often that it creates the effect of someone trying to convince himself of an argument, not others.
Clip from "The Fountainhead" (1949)
THE STUFF OF DREAMS
Living in Los Angeles, a city of agonizingly random architecture, I can relate to all the heated design debates at the center of The Fountainhead. Indeed, in establishing an analogical relationship to architecture and to any creative endeavor that must struggle to maintain its personal integrity in the face of public opinion, The Fountainhead is at its most successful.
| Dominique eyes Roarke's latest imposing erection |
The fact that we live in a time when the evil and incompetent prosper; individuals justify the most heinous points of view with the assertion “I’m not the only one that feels this way!” (as if that were ever a gauge of honor); when ignorance is endorsed and education is labeled elitism by those left feeling inadequate in the presence of intelligence... all lead me to expect that The Fountainhead should feel more relevant than ever.
Unfortunately, Ayn Rand can’t seem to get out of her own way long enough to let the points she wishes to make stand on their own merits of logic. Much like the character of Ellsworth Toohey, who feels he has to tell the public what to think, Rand doesn’t trust the viewer to weigh Objectivist issues for themselves. Rand's fondness for words prevents the medium of film from doing what it does best: evoke, not explain. Rand's handling of her own work is all too obvious. When I say The Fountainhead is black and white, I’m not just referring to the cinematography.
Watching the film today, it takes considerable effort to get
my mind to relax and just let the movie entertain me as it did in the past. It
feels like I spend the first ten minutes or so just trying to blot out the sermonizing.
Mercifully, if I allow myself to focus on the sumptuous Max Steiner score (Gone With the Wind, Casablanca), and sink into Robert Burks’ rapturous cinematography (Vertigo, North by Northwest), pretty soon I’m back where I want to be. No
longer a postulate at the lectern of Objectivism, just a movie fan enjoying a staggeringly gorgeous film.
Copyright © Ken Anderson 2009 - 2012
It's been a little while. I was afraid you'd decided to stop blogging! What a treat to come here today and see that you're back in action.
ReplyDeleteThe screen caps are unbelievable. What a striking, striking film. I've seen it twice, I think, and enjoyed watching it very much, though your insights with it have added some new dimension to it for me.
I have read, over the years, SO MANY actors and actresses in interviews give Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead as an answer when asked, "What is your favorite book?" I have yet to read it myself, but always mean to just to see what all the fuss is about. Not sure when I'll make the time...
Thanks!
Hi Poseidon3, Happy New Year! The New Year always starts out very busy for us folks in the fitness business (those resolutions tend to hit the dust by March) so I haven't blogged in a while. Very nice of you to even notice. However, I see that you've been VERY prolific on your blog with some great posts.
ReplyDeletehttp://neptsdepths.blogspot.com
Yes, "The Fountainhead" is a pretty amazing book, and I can well understand why so many actors consider it a favorite. It literally turns egoism and self-obsession into a philosophy. The Howard Roark courtroom speech is the perfect thing to read to chase off bouts of pre-audition jitters and any guilt born of making obscene amounts of money for play-acting. :-)
As always, Poseidon, thanks for taking the time to read!
I find that, when encountering a film that is cinematically excellent but filled with long chunks of problematic dialogue.... it helps to turn the dvd's language setting to "French". Seriously. It got me through the STAR WARS prequels.
ReplyDeleteWow! In the words of Hayley Mills, What a scathingly brilliant idea! Even if you are joking (and I don't think you are) it's the perfect solution for my "The Fountainhead" problem. I'm going to try it with "Casino," too...I love that film, but Joe Pesci's voice...Yikes! Much appreciated, anonymous!
DeleteThis film had long been on my "must-see" list, and now that I've experienced it for myself, I am able to re-read the above review with new perspective.
ReplyDeleteSo many observations...where to begin?
Perhaps some context might help: I saw this film right after a screening of "The Grapes of Wrath". So it was the dirt-poor sharecropper Tom Joad against the filthy rich skyscraper architect Howard Roark--collectivism versus individualism. I'm genuinely curious if John Steinbeck and Ayn Rand ever met each other.
I'm not an expert on Ayn Rand, but her philosophies as put forth in "The Fountainhead" leave something to be desired. I can dig a lot of what she is saying, but to label collectivism as "parasitic", all the while (and correct me if I misinterpret her) trumpeting the virtues of individualism and capitalistic endeavour in a free enterprise society, is a massive contradiction.
Howard Roark says in the film that he never works for free (i.e. he never lets someone else have an idea for nothing), because to work for free is slavery, something that he opposes. That's a laughable philosophy when one considers that capitalism is a system where one person can get filthy rich from running a business that, at the other end, has children in a third world country working twelve hours a day for less than a dollar an hour. I'm also reminded of the "two and a half cents" earned by workers in "The Grapes of Wrath".
Ayn Rand calls collectivism "parasitic", but then what does that make capitalism? Howard Roark's buildings do not appear magically by themselves. Capitalism IS a collective agreement, one made between workers and employers. Let's see the Howard Roarks of the world achieve anything "to the best of their ability" without thousands of worker bees and drone ants scurrying about the place, working for crumbs while the Howard Roarks reap the big fat dough.
"The Fountainhead" is a rather entertaining film, but it does get pretty silly near the end. I don't want to give too much away, but let's just say that Gail Wynand sure has a funny way going about ensuring his "legacy". As for the final scene, all that was missing from Gary Cooper was a cape flapping in the breeze and a fat letter 'S' on his chest!
Ellsworth Toohey, as played by Robert Douglas, is an absolute hoot! He's like a fiendish collectivist Vincent Price!
As much as there is happening on the screen, one remembers that at the time this film was made, there was behind-the-scenes romance/turmoil involving Gary Cooper and Patricia Neal. But perhaps more interesting is how the main players might have felt about Ayn Rand and her ideas. As you said, Ken, it's not at all surprising to learn that many folks in Hollywood endorse the Ayn Rand philosophy.
Hi Mark
DeleteSo glad you finally got to see "The Fountainhead"! I'm no expert of Rand either, but the points you make seem pretty spot-on for me. The best observation you make is how her philosophy as presented in the film makes no allowances for the fact that "someone" has to build these things, and an individualist like Roark is dependent upon them (and their financial subjugation) to remain as rich as he is.
None of it pans out very thoughtfully and I loved your seizing upon that fact. It is, however, a beautiful film to look at, but alas, not to listen to. Oh, and your link to that "building" in Melbourne is a classic capper! Indeed, just the sort of individualism in architecture that Roark would have applauded! Thanks for your great comments, Mark!
Oh, just one more thing: I'm proud to say that I saw "The Fountainhead" inside the ACMI building, noted for being the most prominent post-modernist eyesore in Melbourne! I couldn't think of a more fitting venue! They ought to rename it "The Howard Roark Building". Need convincing?
ReplyDeletehttp://journal.media-culture.org.au/files/journals/1/articles/225/supp/225-836-2-SP.jpg
http://cache.websetters.com.au/images/1145-300x800invisible_speakers-federation_square.jpg
I saw this film (and read the novel) so, so long ago, I'm afraid I don't really remember it. But looking at your striking screencaps, I can see just how beautiful is the cinematography (those slashing b/w diagonals) as well as the sets, and why it's now considered camp: it's a riot of phallic symbolism (just that image of Patricia Neal lusting over that drill--honest, you wonder how actors could keep a straight face sometimes performing these scenes). No doubt the torrid Cooper/Neal affair then taking place lends this film a cult aura (from what I've read, I gather Cooper was not the most considerate of lovers). But I think I'd watch it simply because Neal is so drop-dead gorgeous to look at; her bone structure alone is stunning. If you haven't seen it, I recommend seeing Cooper and Neal in their follow-up film, Bright Leaf, in which, like another gloss on their real-life affair, they play a pair of neurotic, tormenting lovers (Coop's character is particularly nasty); meanwhile, in true Hollywood fashion, both of them look like Vogue cover models. Add a jaw-droppingly beautiful Lauren Bacall as co-star, and you have a film to feast on.
ReplyDeleteHi GOM
DeleteThis really is a marvelous movie to look at, but oh so hard on the ears. This was my first exposure to a young Patricia Neal (when I was a kid I only knew her as that lady from the coffee commercials) and she is a knockout. I must check out "Bright Leaf" -which aired just last month on TCM but I let it pass - for the sheer pleasure of looking at her and Cooper.
As an early comment suggested, this one is a great film to watch with the sound muted.
You can check out Bright Leaf on Youtube here -enjoy! - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hjpC4zRp3Ow
DeleteWow! Thanks for the link, GOM. Just took a quick peek and the film looks amazing. I didn't expect it to be a period movie! Can't wait to check it out!
Delete