Spoiler Alert. This is a critical essay, not a review, so plot points will be revealed for discussion purposes.
Have you ever come across one of those hysterical clickbait links with a headline screaming, “You’ll be shocked to see what (insert any celebrity ...99% of the time, a woman) looks like today!” only to discover that the person has simply aged naturally?
Or maybe you've noticed that—while the posting of heavily filtered, augmented, and body-tuned selfies is nothing new—they all now seem to be aiming for the same standardized mannequin aesthetic.
ALL ABOUT EVE (1950)
You may have seen the male fitness influencer (on a silent cycle of HGH injections) who cloaks ordinary male narcissism in self-discipline and success-driven rhetoric. Employing aggressive Alpha language (fight, power, self-domination, conquering pain) in obvious compensation for an underlying unease with what might be perceived as a “socially feminine” preoccupation with looks.
And perhaps you’ve had the misfortune of encountering the AI artwork of a “creator” who wants to share with you his/her depiction of the ideal in female beauty: Which somehow ALWAYS means a vacantly staring white woman with the exaggerated eyes and lips of a Bratz doll and a body of Jessica Rabbit cartoon proportions.
VEEP- 2019
![]() |
The most successful form of oppression is when you get the marginalized to enforce their own subjugation |
Even my writing this—social commentary cloaked in subjective/objective observations about the private (our bodies are our own and nobody else’s business) that we insist on making public (resulting in our bodies and physical appearance playing a disproportionately large role in shaping our experience of the world)—is but another example of the same cultural malady we all perpetuate, participate in, and suffer from.
In The Substance, French filmmaker Coralie Fargeat takes a laceratingly frank look at bodies- our own and the bodies of others- and our relationship with them. Using vivid imagery and startling symbolism, Fargeat confronts the attitudes, conflicts, phobias, and fetishes we attach to our all-too-weak flesh with a take-no-prisoners bravado. Forcing us to examine how our reckless pursuit of beauty standards has blurred the jagged line between self-care and self-mutilation. And Fargeat does so without offering solutions, reassurance, or much concern for our comfort zones.
THE MIRROR CRACK'D (1980)
Only the second feature film from the gifted director/writer/editor, The Substance is a darkly surreal fairy tale exploring body image, beauty standards, aging, self-loathing, misogyny, disposable people culture, patriarchy, psychological violence, and two of my all-time favorite themes: dualism and the human desire to connect and be loved.
Though in so many ways unlike anything I’ve ever seen before, The Substance possesses a visual richness that pays homage to classic cinema while blazing an audaciously unique path all its own. Psychological, cultural, and emotional truths merge with a barely-linked-to-reality narrative that evokes a monstro-mutation of All About Eve, Showgirls, Death Becomes Her, The Portrait of Dorian Gray, Perfect, Black Swan, Carrie, the erotic exercise series Aerobicise, and of course:
Sunset Boulevard (1950)
![]() |
This movie is 75 years old. A society really must have a serious talk with itself to explain how a woman losing her mind because she's turning 50 is still a thing |
Embodying the tagline of 1974’s The Day of the Locust: “It Happened in Hollywood, But It Could Have Happened in Hell,” The Substance is set in a present-day Hollywood of the mind—a Hollywood where it sometimes snows, people still read newspapers to find jobs, nighttime talk show hosts are Black, exercise TV programs are ratings blockbusters, and ‘80s/‘90s aesthetics...like legwarmers...have never really left.
The film's anti-heroine is once-popular, Oscar-winning actress Elisabeth Sparkle (it’s her real name; for we learn in school she was called Lizzie Sparkle, “the most beautiful girl in the world”…at least according to Fred in 10th-grade homeroom). Elisabeth is on the verge of an existential crisis.
![]() |
Demi Moore as Elisabeth Sparkle |
![]() |
Margaret Qualley as Sue |
The (de)evolution of Elisabeth’s career suggests perhaps ageism played a role in her no longer acting in movies (roles for women over 40 make up only 5% of available female film roles), leading her down the B-List showbiz path of TV aerobics guru -"Sparkle Your Life with Elisabeth" - and advertising spokesperson exploiting her catchphrase "You Got It!" A career in which her success and fame are entirely linked to her physical appearance and age-defying physicality.
Alas, age-defying doesn't mean age-less. On her 50th birthday, Elisabeth receives (in the harshest way imaginable) the world-shattering news that she and her long-running TV show are to be put out to pasture to make room for a tighter, firmer, younger version of both.
![]() |
Dennis Quaid as Network Executive (wouldn't you know it) Harvey |
As emphasized by the film’s Kubrick-esque camera angles and macro closeups, The Substance is partially an allegory about distorted perceptions. Henry's lack of self-perception makes him think he's a charming winner instead of a bullying sociopath, his inner sense of inadequacy manifesting in external outbursts of psychological violence.
On the distaff side, Elisabeth's lack of self-perception is a kind of mind blindness. She has an inability to latch onto any yardstick of self-evaluation not linked to impossible aesthetic norms and the validation of the male gaze. Her lack of self-esteem manifesting in escalating internal (and later, VERY external) outbursts of self-directed violence...psychological, emotional, and physical. In fact, she hates herself.
![]() |
The fact that an entire wall of Elisabeth's Barbarella spaceship-style penthouse is dominated by a floor-to-ceiling portrait of herself tells us everything we need to know about her priorities |
It can be said that Elisabeth's lack of inner substance...exemplified in her complete embrace of superficial beauty ideals that undermine her worth as a human...is the fatal character flaw that sets the conflict of The Substance in motion. But it's impossible not to feel empathy.
One can always detect discernable traces of self-loathing behind the physical perfection-seekers of our culture, but since we're a society that values overachievement no matter how hollow the reward -as in celebrating "good" plastic surgery or the "quickest" fad diet- we reinforce the notion that "looking" like we're okay on the outside is more important than actually "being" okay inside.
That's one of the reasons why fame and celebrity are so sought-after by those plagued by self-disgust; the meaningless external validation of strangers still works like lead to the kryptonite of introspection.
Letting others define you and tell you exactly what you need to be, do, and look like to make yourself worthy of love is a doctrine that clearly works for a great many people. Religions have been doing it for centuries, and they swear by it (literally).
Of course, the implicit caveat behind the conditional love and transitory admiration offered by celebrity and fame is the understanding that said "star" must never change or age.
"Youth and beauty are not accomplishments. They're the temporary happy by-products
of time and/or DNA. Don't hold your breath for either." Carrie Fisher -2015
For someone like Elisabeth, being told that she's at the end of her career is like telling her she's at the end of her life. The Substance—an underground youth elixir that promises a younger, more beautiful, and more perfect version of oneself—enters Elisabeth’s life at the exact moment she starts to feel its impending erasure. How convenient.And while the promise of that little Day-Glo vial is irresistible and appears to be the solution to all of Elisabeth's problems, anyone who's read a Stephen King novel, watched an Amicus anthology horror film, or seen an episode of The Twilight Zone knows-
...there's always a catch.
![]() |
Whoopi Goldberg - Ghost (1990) |
The above image of the injected and divided egg yolk will have to serve as summary of how the drug known as The Substance works. Fargeat is far too compelling a visual storyteller (and it's all too far-out and surreal) for anything I write to do it justice.
I will say that The Substance does indeed create a new, fully formed, independent person from Elisabeth’s DNA (picture Botticelli’s "The Birth of Venus" reimagined by David Cronenberg); however, Sue, as she names herself, is more a “side” of Elisabeth than a new “version.”
![]() |
Self Care "I guess I just try to be myself. To be sincere and grateful for all that I have. And to always remember to lead with my heart." |
The new women share an irksomely inconsistent consciousness and live an alternating existence of one week on, one week off. It’s a bit like if the adult, self-possessed part of me and the side that still compulsively bites my nails existed as two separate people. It’s definitely ME biting my nails; however, in most cases, it’s something I do without conscious awareness. I often “catch” myself biting my nails, which sounds absurd since it’s ME, yet that’s how it works. You’re one, yet it’s still possible to act as though you are disconnected from yourself.
Sweet Sue
![]() |
No one else, it seems, ever shared my dreams. And without you, dear, I don't know what I'd do. |
In Robert Altman's 3 Women (1977), Sissy Spacek plays a character named Pinky Rose (!) who cultivates a hyperfeminine personality that comes to dominate and drain the life force of her roommate Shelley Duvall. A similar dynamic develops between Elisabeth and Sue in The Substance, turning this already ingeniously assaultive allegory into an absolutely demented roar of anger confronting the horrific violence we’re willing to inflict upon ourselves (body and psyche) in the pursuit of unattainable perfection.
WHAT I LOVE ABOUT THIS FILM
I don't often write about contemporary films, but when I do, I've noticed that most of them tend to be of a "sort": Hereditary (2018), Black Swan (2010), Midsommar (2019), Maps to the Stars (2014), Nocturnal Animals (2016). This sort being movies that convey a sense of auteurist vision, independent daring, and a kind of audacity of approach that reminds me of that unique "Only in the '70s" sense of the unpredictable that made so many films from that era so great. And so insane!
I love everything about The Substance: its immersive use of sound (incredible!), color, camera angles, editing, and locations. All is in service of the film's meticulously crafted worldview. And while absolutely everything feels excessive, nothing feels wasteful.
Best of all, I think it's a very smart movie. It knows what it wants to say and, by refusing to spell everything out, doesn't mind if what's being expressed is misunderstood. Indeed, in some ways, it could be said that The Substance dares you to like it.
I found The Substance compelling, grotesque, ingenious, and sharp as a razor. It moved me, grossed me out, and the ending, in particular, is so poignant (major waterworks) that it’s a shame the scene itself is so difficult to watch. Speaking of which, I've seen The Substance four times—well, make that three; the first time shouldn't count because I spent so much time covering my eyes—and each time, I continue to discover new things. What an electrifying movie!
The Final Metamorphosis
"Few things are sadder than the truly monstrous." Nathanael West - The Day of the Locust -1939 |
THE STUFF OF DREAMS
For a film about an actress, set in Hollywood (filmed in France) and exploring the pressures placed on women to be perfect, I appreciate how Coralie Fargeat and her team utilize a visual storytelling style that has the viewer perpetually processing this new story (The Angry Young Woman has yet to become a trope, but I think it might be on its way) through the echo of familiar cinematic imagery.
The power of images is immense, which is why it's crucial to ask ourselves who is behind the representations we see of ourselves in movies, TV, and advertising. If those controlling what we see are also the people who hate us, then their only vested interest is in teaching us how to hate ourselves.
![]() |
The obsession with perfection is the core theme of both The Substance and Darren Aronofsky's Black Swan |
![]() |
The Substance and Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey Grids and Richard Strauss's " Thus Spake Zarathustra feature in both films |
These bold callbacks to Kubrick's The Shining heighten The Substance's use
of confined spaces to create tension and convey a sense of imminent violence.
This is a two-hander as far as I'm concerned, with both Demi Moore and Margaret Qualley delivering full-throttle, pull-out-the-stops performances that are each unimaginable without the other. Qualley is new to me, but she had me in her pocket in the silent scene where Sue comes upon an indented easy chair and TV remote- evidence that Elisabeth has been wasting her allotted time doing nothing but watching television. The acute level of disapproving judgment and disgust that comes across Qualley's face at this moment speaks volumes about her character. I don't know how she did it.
![]() |
American Beauty / Black Dahlia |
I have to confess I'm not the best Demi Moore fan. I checked on IMDB to see how many of her films I'd seen...grand total: five (my favorite being Mortal Thoughts -1991). Before The Substance, I had not seen Moore in a movie since the 2007 Kevin Costner thriller Mr. Brooks, and I hadn't even REMEMBERED she was in it!
Moore came back into my awareness when a relative gifted me her 2019 memoir (which I initially met with a WTF? but it turns out the book is really terrific). And then, last year, she turned in a brief but powerful performance in the FX series FEUD: Capote vs. The Swans. And I was besotted.
![]() |
"You got it!" |
In a largely silent role, Moore is wonderfully expressive in conveying everything that Elisabeth feels and experiences. Much like what I've always admired about Julie Christie, Moore meets the challenge of giving an essentially superficial character enough depth for us to relate to and empathize with.
BONUS MATERIAL
Reality + (2014)
In this early short film by Coralie Fargeat, she touches upon many of the same themes
![]() |
Revenge (2017) Coralie Fargeat made her feature film directing debut with this action thriller starring Matilda Lutz and Kevin Janssens |
Jurassic Fitness
Of course, I absolutely loved that Elisabeth Sparkle was an aerobics instructor! That brief "Sparkle Your Life with Elizabeth" sequence was like watching my past flash before my eyes. Every move executed in her class was one I'd done thousands of times. Even the toxic inspirational/abusive language rings true - "Think of those bikini bods! You wanna look like a giant jellyfish on the beach?"The photo on the right is an outtake from a mercifully unproduced step-aerobics video project.
Having worked as a group exercise instructor and trainer for over 30 years (1985 -2019), I was pretty much immersed in a world that feeds on and perpetuates everything that The Substance is about (explaining why I respond and relate so strongly to it). The promotion of oppressive beauty standards has always been a part of our society, but the kind of perfectionist extremes The Substance speaks to have their roots in the "exercising for the aesthetics" trend of '80s fitness culture.
In fact, that tiny figure in the far left side of the movie screencap at the bottom is me working as an extra in the 1985 John Travolta/Jamie Lee Curtis aerobics exercise opus called...you guessed it, "Perfect."
![]() |
Sue's "Pump It Up" exercise TV program is satirically over-the-top, but from 1980 to 1982, the cable network Showtime ran a truly hilariously overheated "erotic exercise" program called "Aerobicise" that makes Sue's show look like a documentary. There's a YouTube channel devoted to it HERE. |
Take Care of Yourself
Wow, Ken, so you worked with Travolta! I certainly thought The Substance was a superb film, more of a parody than a pure genre film. But discovering your side as a cinematic extra far outweighs any other circumstance.
ReplyDeleteRegards,
Juan
Hello, nice to hear from you again, Juan -
DeleteHa! I didn’t work “with” Travolta so much as worked “Travolta adjacent,” but as a lifelong film fan, it was a utter and complete thrill to actually work as an extra on a major (albeit unwatchably terrible) feature film and see how it was made, up close.
I was actually more excited about Gordon Willis (Klute, The Godfather) being the cinematographer. While everyone was trying to get Travolta’s attention between set-ups, I was watching how Willis worked. What a dream!
Anyhow, thanks for reading this so soon.
Glad to hear you thought The Substance was superb, too. I think it’s one of those films that fully resists fitting comfortably into a specific genre description.
Comedic, horrific, surreal, dramatic, satiric, grand guignol, allegory... all apply, but none exclusively.
Your view of it as a parody sounds intriguing…perhaps you will write about it on your film blog? (Given how many films you see, and what a prolific writer you are, you probably already have. I’ll check.)
Thanks for commenting, Juan, and your excitement about my film extra experience (I think the Blu-ray aspect ratio cuts me out completely) brought back a few happy memories of how exciting the whole thing was.
Hope all is well, Cheers!
Great critique! Very insightful! Enjoyed reading it!
ReplyDeleteAll the best,
Kendrick
Hello, Kendrick! -
DeleteI appreciate that. Very much.
I often read things I enjoy online, but all too often, I never take the time to drop a line to the writer to let them know. Writing is hard, solitary work, and I forget how much a gesture like that can mean.
Given the number of blogs out there, I'm grateful you stopped by and read my essay. That you also took the time to let me know you enjoyed it is a bonus.
A tip of the hat to you, Kendrick. Cheers!
I'm sure I speak for many when I say I'm still devouring everything you write (thanks RSS!) even when I'm not commenting. I opened this one thinking "Ken reviewed a movie made after 1980?" and was glad to see your rundown of the very short list you've seen fit to cover.
ReplyDeleteAs for _The Substance_, I definitely didn't like it as much as I was expecting going in. While I don't have any trouble with the science fantasy aspects, I generally have to work really hard to suspend disbelief when the economics makes no sense. Another dumb complaint was that by an hour in I was so sick of seeing those same two goddamned hallways but yes, we did then have to see them each another dozen times. The ending in the theater was quite welcome just to have a change of scene.
You haven't reviewed _The Phantom of Paradise_, have you? Apparently there is an annual festival in (for no reason) Winnipeg devoted to it.
Allen!
DeleteHow great to hear from you. And thanks for letting me know you’ve remained a reader all this time. I’d thought we’d lost touch contact way back when there was such a thing as Google +.
Regarding THE SUBSTANCE, I think your complaints about the film are far from unfounded. Isn’t it often the small or ancillary details that pull us out of the reality a movie tries to immerse us in?
While this doesn’t apply to THE SUBSTANCE, suspension of disbelief is always challenged when I watch a horror film where the characters behave as if they’ve never seen a horror film before. For instance, that overused trope of someone who turns out not to be a threat silently approaching a person and placing their hand on their shoulder, scaring them senseless. Why wouldn’t they say something first?
And I laughed--in empathy--at your frustration with all those hallways! HA! Once you started taking notice of it, the sheer number of those hallway shots must have driven you bats.
I’m a fan of PHANTOM OF THE PARADISE, but have yet to write about it. But thanks for sharing the news about that annual Winnipeg festival. It seemed so random that I had to Google it to find out more. You probably already know this, but I had no idea that back in 1974, PHANTOM flopped everywhere except Winnipeg. It apparently ran there for months! It’s such an isolated thing; were it a movie, the answer would be there was something in the water.
Thanks for reading this post and commenting. And especially for sticking with this blog since waaaaay back.
Take care.
I don't know if this movie will ever cross my path (I see far fewer contemporary movies than even you do!), but it seems interesting. (A serious rumination on some themes found in "Death Becomes Her?") I had a couple of pals almost cheering that fact that Demi didn't win an Oscar, which sort of mystified me because, even though she isn't some big favorite of mine, I always admire someone (especially a female) who can stick in out in a savage business like Hollywood screen acting for a long haul, and succeed! I don't watch the Os anymore, but looking at the clothes this morning I saw a lot of really bad, scary trends among the "actresses." And they probably think they look really great! (They don't. As far as I'm concerned.) When you wrote this: "And perhaps you’ve had the misfortune of encountering the AI artwork of a “creator” who wants to share with you his/her depiction of the ideal in female beauty: Which somehow ALWAYS means a vacantly staring white woman with the exaggerated eyes and lips of a Bratz doll and a body of Jessica Rabbit cartoon proportions.," my mind immediately went to a person called Julia Fox who attended the Vanity Fair party nearly naked and resembled the description you gave. There isn't much further for a person to go....! It's surreal. Glad to see you busily writing. And fun to see the flyer from your aerobic days!!! (I did do one of my crazed write-ups of "Perfect" quite a few years back, though I'm sure you've seen that.) Take care and thanks!
ReplyDeleteHi Jon –
DeleteThanks for reading this. My partner, who has no interest in horror films—especially not body horror—had no desire to see THE SUBSTANCE. However, after reading about its central themes, he has said he now wants to watch it with me (hello, 5th time!).
I think, especially considering what you shared about Demi Moore (I feel the same way... she has certainly paid her dues throughout her career, and I’m glad that at an age when Hollywood has historically discarded actresses, she is experiencing a kind of renaissance), you may want to give it a shot one day. It’s definitely worth pondering a topic that was once seen as very Hollywood, but has now permeated all walks of life thanks to selfie culture and the internet.
And you’re right; it’s just as outrageous as DEATH BECOMES HER, but it offers a bit more humanity to the women who are so critical of themselves and feel the pressure to conform. Additionally, it provides a clearer perspective on the patriarchy that continues to fuel the idea that a woman’s appearance is the only measure of her worth.
Writing about THE SUBSTANCE so close to the OSCARS (which I have never missed since the year Bonnie and Clyde was nominated) was so interesting because it informed so much of my viewing experience.
I was aware that while I felt comfortable with criticizing the fashions I liked or didn’t like (that’s the fun), but I was aware of not wanting to get into evaluating anyone’s physical appearance or judging their choice of what they felt made them look nice.
My mind went to Dolly Parton and (paraphrasing) how she once said that she knows there are those who think her look is extreme, but she felt pretty this way and that when she feels she looks good, she’s happy. That it didn’t really matter if others agreed.
That’s one of the more poignant points THE SUBTANCE makes, and watching the Oscars really made it hit home. If you like the way you look in something, more power to you. There’s really nobody else to please but yourself.
I have no issue with how anyone chooses to dress or what they do to themselves, as long as it makes them happy. If I have an issue at all, it’s with how narrow and uniform the standards are. There’s a conformity that suggests to people there is only ONE way to look good (i.e., skinny, crease-free, young, and fit). It was nice to see older stars like Goldie Hawn and June Squibb there.
By the way, with each new year of Oscar watching, there are more “Who’s that?” coming from my corner. Like, I have no idea who Julia Fox is!
And, yes, I'd read your excellent and hilarious review of PERFECT (could it really be as far back as 2011?) and in revisiting it loved your laughed aloud (again) at your rumination on the fate of cinematographer Gordon Willis "Having to set up his camera in a stark, artless dance studio and aim his camera at Curtis's taint for hours on end." Ha! it's so true. As is your speculation that a lot of the men's prominent bulges look suspiciously fake.
Though I think its a dread movie and very hard to watch, I think i should write about it so i can at least relay some of what I remember about participating in it while I can still remember.
Thank you for reading this and commenting, Jon.
You're the best! Take care.